IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/03-lng-2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

American and Russian “victory” discourse: a conflict of cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Anna D. Plisetskaya

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

This article focuses on the presidential rhetoric of Russian and American leaders at the end of their latest campaigns, taking their victory speeches given immediately after winning their respective elections as examples. The comparative cross-cultural research presented in this study includes cognitive, corpus, and rhetorical approaches and is carried out within the framework of critical discourse analysis. The interconnection between language, culture and politics is evident through metaphors used by national leaders. The metaphor THE RUSSIAN NATION IS AT WAR reconstructed in President Putin’s victory speech is quite different from the metaphor THE AMERICAN NATION IS ONE FAMILY found in President Obama’s victory speech. Archetypal metaphors found in both speeches reflect public values that turn out to be highly contrastive and explain some cultural and political differences between the great powers.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna D. Plisetskaya, 2013. "American and Russian “victory” discourse: a conflict of cultures," HSE Working papers WP BRP 03/LNG/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:03/lng/2013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/12/20/1338799322/03LNG2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    rhetorical strategies; archetypal metaphor; metaphorical concept; corpus data; public values;

    JEL classification:

    • Z19 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:03/lng/2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamil Abdulaev) or (Victoria Elkina). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.