IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Den Dahménska ansatsens tillkomst och dess ställning i den schumpeterianska tanketraditionen

Listed author(s):
Registered author(s):

    I denna uppsats visas att Dahmén redan 1939 hade kommit fram till den grundläggande transformationsteoretiska syn han redovisade i sin licentiat avhandling av 1942. I en djuplodande analys av felinvesteringarnas roll i långsiktiga utvecklingsförlopp grundlade Dahmén 1939 för det utvecklingsblocksbegrepp som är licavhandlingens främsta konceptuella bidrag. Dahmén hade där genom sin fokusering på felinvesteringsproblematiken nått fram till den syn på den ekonomiska utvecklingen som kom till uttryck i hans 1941 kritik av Schumpeters Business Cycles av 1939. Med sin analys av interdependensen mellan utvecklingens positiva och negativa sida föregrep Dahmén innebörden av Schumpeters bevingade begrepp av 1942 ”creative destruction”, samtidigt som han därmed också gav detta begrepp den djupare kausalanalytiska förankring som var nödvändig för att det skulle kunna användas som verktyg i studiet av ekonomiska transformationsprocesser.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by The Ratio Institute in its series Ratio Working Papers with number 12.

    in new window

    Length: 17 pages
    Date of creation: 25 Sep 2002
    Publication status: Published in Den svenska tillväxtskolan. Om den ekonomiska utvecklingens kreativa förstörelse, Johansson, Dan, Karlson, Nils (eds.), 2002, chapter 3, Ratio.
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0012
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden

    Phone: 08-441 59 00
    Fax: 08-441 59 29
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Martin Korpi)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.