The Conventional Formula for the Nominal Growth Rate of Free Cash Flows is OK -- A Comment on Three Recent Papers in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance
The conventional formula for the nominal growth rate of free cash flows (equal to dividends when there is no interest-bearing debt) says that this growth rate is equal to the product of the plowback ratio and the nominal rate of return on the assets (the latter equal to book equity when there is no debt). In a recent issue of the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, M. Bradley and G. A. Jarrell claim that the conventional formula is wrong when there is positive inflation, proposing instead an alternative formula. In a rejoinder to that paper in the same journal, G. Friedl and B. Schwetzler assert that the conventional formula is right. In a comment on Friedl and Schwetzler, Bradley and Jarrell reassert their original position, that is, the conventional formula is wrong and the alternative one is right. This note shows that the conventional formula is right and that both formulas give the same nominal growth rate. Consequently, both are OK.
|Date of creation:||25 Nov 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +46-(0)8-736 90 00
Fax: +46-(0)8-31 01 57
Web page: http://www.hhs.se/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michael Bradley & Gregg A. Jarrell, 2008. "Expected Inflation and the Constant-Growth Valuation Model," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 20(2), pages 66-78.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:hastba:2011_006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Helena Lundin)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Helena Lundin to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.