IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-02649025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the profitability of selfish blockchain mining under consideration of ruin

Author

Listed:
  • Hansjörg Albrecher
  • Pierre-Olivier Goffard

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Mining blocks on a blockchain equipped with a proof of work consensus protocol is well-known to be resource-consuming. A miner bears the operational cost, mainly electricity consumption and IT gear, of mining, and is compensated by a capital gain when a block is discovered. This paper aims at quantifying the profitability of mining when the possible event of ruin is also considered. This is done by formulating a tractable stochastic model and using tools from applied probability and analysis, including the explicit solution of a certain type of advanced functional differential equation. The expected profit at a future time point is determined for the situation when the miner follows the protocol as well as when he/she withholds blocks. The obtained explicit expressions allow us to analyze the sensitivity with respect to the different model components and to identify conditions under which selfish mining is a strategic advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansjörg Albrecher & Pierre-Olivier Goffard, 2021. "On the profitability of selfish blockchain mining under consideration of ruin," Working Papers hal-02649025, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02649025
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02649025v3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02649025v3/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avanzi, Benjamin & U. Gerber, Hans & S.W. Shiu, Elias, 2007. "Optimal dividends in the dual model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 111-123, July.
    2. Pierre-Olivier Goffard, 2019. "Fraud risk assessment within blockchain transactions," Working Papers hal-01716687, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hansjörg Albrecher & José Carlos Araujo-Acuna, 2022. "On The Randomized Schmitter Problem," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 515-535, June.
    2. Hansjörg Albrecher & Dina Finger & Pierre-Olivier Goffard, 2022. "Blockchain mining in pools: Analyzing the trade-off between profitability and ruin," Working Papers hal-03336851, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hansjoerg Albrecher & Pierre-Olivier Goffard, 2020. "On the profitability of selfish blockchain mining under consideration of ruin," Papers 2010.12577, arXiv.org.
    2. Ewa Marciniak & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2018. "On the Optimal Dividend Problem in the Dual Model with Surplus-Dependent Premiums," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 533-552, November.
    3. Yin, Chuancun & Wen, Yuzhen, 2013. "Optimal dividend problem with a terminal value for spectrally positive Lévy processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 769-773.
    4. Rodney J. Garratt & Maarten R. C. van Oordt, 2023. "Why Fixed Costs Matter for Proof-of-Work–Based Cryptocurrencies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6482-6507, November.
    5. Benjamin Avanzi & Debbie Kusch Falden & Mogens Steffensen, 2022. "Stable Dividends under Linear-Quadratic Optimization," Papers 2210.03494, arXiv.org.
    6. Arash Fahim & Lingjiong Zhu, 2016. "Asymptotic Analysis for Optimal Dividends in a Dual Risk Model," Papers 1601.03435, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    7. Xu, Ran & Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2020. "Optimal dividend and capital injection strategy with a penalty payment at ruin: Restricted dividend payments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Peng, Dan & Liu, Donghai & Liu, Zaiming, 2013. "Dividend problems in the dual risk model with exponentially distributed observation time," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 841-849.
    9. Goffard, Pierre-Olivier & Lefèvre, Claude, 2018. "Duality in ruin problems for ordered risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 44-52.
    10. Yongwu Li & Zhongfei Li & Yan Zeng, 2016. "Equilibrium Dividend Strategy with Non-exponential Discounting in a Dual Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 699-722, February.
    11. Lingjiong Zhu, 2015. "A State-Dependent Dual Risk Model," Papers 1510.03920, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    12. Gerber, Hans U. & Smith, Nathaniel, 2008. "Optimal dividends with incomplete information in the dual model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 227-233, October.
    13. Benjamin Avanzi & Jos'e-Luis P'erez & Bernard Wong & Kazutoshi Yamazaki, 2016. "On optimal joint reflective and refractive dividend strategies in spectrally positive L\'evy models," Papers 1607.01902, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2016.
    14. Hongshuai Dai & Zaiming Liu & Nana Luan, 2010. "Optimal dividend strategies in a dual model with capital injections," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 72(1), pages 129-143, August.
    15. Ran Xu & Wenyuan Wang & Jose Garrido, 2022. "Optimal Dividend Strategy Under Parisian Ruin with Affine Penalty," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1385-1409, September.
    16. Bayraktar, Erhan & Kyprianou, Andreas E. & Yamazaki, Kazutoshi, 2014. "Optimal dividends in the dual model under transaction costs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 133-143.
    17. Ng, Andrew C.Y., 2009. "On a dual model with a dividend threshold," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 315-324, April.
    18. Jean-Guillaume Dumas & Sonia Jimenez-Garces & Florentina Șoiman, 2021. "Risk analyses of the crypto-market: A literature review," Post-Print hal-03112920, HAL.
    19. Zhu, Jinxia & Yang, Hailiang, 2009. "On differentiability of ruin functions under Markov-modulated models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 1673-1695, May.
    20. Czarna, Irmina & Pérez, José-Luis & Yamazaki, Kazutoshi, 2018. "Optimality of multi-refraction control strategies in the dual model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 148-160.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blockchain; miner; cryptocurrency; ruin theory; dual risk model;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02649025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.