IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04620498.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Agenda For a Democratic Economy

Author

Listed:
  • David Cayla

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - Institut Agro Rennes Angers - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)

Abstract

The art of governance requires managers to make "good" decisions that align with accepted standards. Today, the central standard of management is to evaluate the costs and benefits of each option to demonstrate that the selected choice is objectively "good" – with benefits outweighing costs. This approach is prevalent in any decision-making structure where someone makes choices on behalf of others, be it a company, public administration, or non-profit organization. This norm is fundamental to contemporary capitalism, but it is grounded in another institution: the market. According to the neoliberal doctrine, the market's primary function is not as an exchange platform but as a price-creating device (Cayla 2023). This understanding of the market is rooted in the late 19th-century neoclassical framework and was introduced into the public discourse by Ludwig Von Mises' contributions to socialism (Mises 1920, 1922). For Mises, the market mechanism is indispensable for calculating the real value of goods, necessitating private ownership of the means of production. Eugene Fama, fifty years later, held a similar view, stating that "the ideal is a market in which prices provide accurate signals for the allocation of resources" (Fama 1970: 383). However, this norm appears less applicable to contemporary challenges. The subprime crisis of 2008 and the eurozone crisis (2010-2015) illustrated that market prices can disappear or reach levels that jeopardize the economy. Central banks have had to manipulate market prices, such as long-term interest rates, via quantitative easing measures. Other emerging problems, such as the growing scarcity of natural resources, may not be resolved by price signals. More fundamentally, environmental issues such as global warming will force decision-makers to consider other dimensions in collective choices than the standard cost/benefit calculation based on short-term market prices. The market's strength as an institutional device is that it "naturalizes" the price system and places it beyond the political sphere. This makes prices acceptable to all parties. However, managing scarce resources may require considering the various possible uses and users of such resources, necessitating the re-introduction of politics into the value calculation process. This would push decisions towards a path that has been previously and collectively decided. This contribution intends to discuss the requirements for such a post-neoliberal doctrine and how to integrate democratic elements into the assessment process of economic decisions. References Cayla, David (2023) The Decline and Fall of Neoliberalisme. Rebuilding the Economy in an Age of Crises, London and New York: Routledge. Fama, Eugene (1970), "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work", The Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 2: 383–417. Mises, Ludwig von (1920) [1990], Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth, trans. S. Adler, Auburn, AL: Mises Institute. Mises, Ludwig von (1922) [1951], Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • David Cayla, 2024. "An Agenda For a Democratic Economy," Post-Print halshs-04620498, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04620498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Cayla, 2022. "How the Digital Economy Challenges the Neoliberal Agenda: Lessons from the Antitrust Policies," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 546-553, April.
    2. David Cayla, 2019. "The Rise of Populist Movements in Europe: A Response to European Ordoliberalism?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 355-362, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Cayla, 2021. "Le « vivre-ensemble » face au projet néolibéral," Post-Print hal-02961194, HAL.
    2. Maxence Follot, 2024. "The impact of populism on central bank communication: Analyzing theoretical developments and the case of Hungary," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 21(1), pages 65-95, June.
    3. Duygu Özlük, 2023. "Next Stage of Global Capitalism: Digital Platforms and Rentier Capitalism," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 8(4), pages 681-695.
    4. Nirmala Pillay, 2021. "The Promise of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (and Brexit) on the Implementation of Economic and Social Rights among EU Member States," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Li Cai & Jianhua Xiao & Renxian Zuo, 2025. "Research on the Evolution Characteristics of Policy System That Supports the Sustainability of Digital Economy: Text Analysis Based on China’s Digital Economy Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04620498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.