IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01496444.html

Cohérence du calcul économique et financement public des grands projets d'infrastructure. Le cas de l'autoroute ferroviaire

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrina Hammiche

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Laurent Denant-Boèmont

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Wieving a generalized congestion for highways in the middle-run, the « autoroute ferroviaire » could be an innovative answer. Nevertheless, economic studies are showing the financial reliability weakness for this project, wich lies in pricing low level for road freight. Such a practice reveals the possibility of inconsis­tency in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Disconnecting pricing and investment is a bias for evaluation, and only Cost-Benefit Analysis and Organisation Evaluation could face with this basic rule of consistency. In such a integrated framework, a new assess­ment is carried out for the project. The variability of public financing to infrastruc­ture pricing is also pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrina Hammiche & Laurent Denant-Boèmont, 1997. "Cohérence du calcul économique et financement public des grands projets d'infrastructure. Le cas de l'autoroute ferroviaire," Post-Print halshs-01496444, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01496444
    DOI: 10.3406/pomap.2005.2302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Laurent Denant-Boemont & Sabrina Hammiche, 2008. "Que vaut la flexibilité des choix individuels de transport ?. Une étude de cas expérimental," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(1), pages 97-111.
    3. Damart, Sébastien & Roy, Bernard, 2009. "The uses of cost-benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 200-212, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01496444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.