IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05240710.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’expérimentation de politique publique en réponse aux problèmes pernicieux vue comme une « mise en dispositif »

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Gand

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble-UGA - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Elvira Periac

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

Public policy experimentation in response to wicked problems as a process of "dispositive formation". To address the "wicked problems" of public policy, experimentation is frequently used to understand and assess the value of organizational innovations. To better grasp the deployment of such experiments within a public governance context involving multiple stakeholders and diverse issues, this article draws on the Foucauldian framework of "dispositive" to study the implementation of the central measure of an experiment conducted in the field of elderly loss of autonomy: the Territorial Support Coordination (CTA in French) within the Paerpa experiment. Processes of "dispositive formation" are studied in two experimental territories. They highlight that the deployment of an experiment diverges from traditional project management, involving a continuous design process guided by the assemblage of heterogeneous elements. This process is distributed among various actors and unfolds across three levels (institutional, project, and operational). The use of this theoretical framework makes visible the role of spatial, discursive, and instrumental elements, as well as the critical importance of integrating the new dispositive with pre-existing ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2025. "L’expérimentation de politique publique en réponse aux problèmes pernicieux vue comme une « mise en dispositif »," Post-Print hal-05240710, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05240710
    DOI: 10.1684/pmp.2025.73
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05240710v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05240710v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1684/pmp.2025.73?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua Newman & Adrian Cherney & Brian W. Head, 2017. "Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 157-174, February.
    2. Christopher Ansell & Robert Geyer, 2017. "‘Pragmatic complexity’ a new foundation for moving beyond ‘evidence-based policy making’?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 149-167, March.
    3. Patrick Gilbert & Nathalie Raulet-Croset, 2021. "Lire le management autrement," Post-Print hal-03251698, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O’Connor John, 2022. "Strengthening the science–policy interface in Ireland," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 70(4), pages 29-52, December.
    2. Crabolu, Gloria & Font, Xavier & Eker, Sibel, 2023. "Evaluating policy complexity with Causal Loop Diagrams," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Sojeong Kim & Adam M. Wellstead & Tanya Heikkila, 2023. "Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 341-362, May.
    4. Starominski-Uehara, Marvin, 2020. "Governance in Crisis: Institutionalizing Reflective Report to Guide Decision Making Under Uncertainty," SocArXiv y3nsa, Center for Open Science.
    5. David Lewis & M. Feisal Rahman & Revocatus Twinomuhangi & Shababa Haque & Nazmul Huq & Saleemul Huq & Lars Ribbe & Asif Ishtiaque, 2023. "University-Based Researchers as Knowledge Brokers for Climate Policies and Action," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(3), pages 656-683, June.
    6. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 2021. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 28-57, March.
    7. Ishani Mukherjee & M. Kerem Coban & Azad Singh Bali, 2021. "Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 243-268, June.
    8. Jesper Dahl Kelstrup & Jonas Videbæk Jørgensen, 2024. "Explaining differences in research utilization in evidence-based government ministries," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 257-280, June.
    9. Jesper Dahl Kelstrup, 2024. "Understanding the role of practical knowledge in evidence-based welfare reform—a three-stage model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Qianjin Zong & Zhihong Huang & Jiaru Huang, 2023. "Can open access increase LIS research’s policy impact? Using regression analysis and causal inference," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4825-4854, August.
    11. Joshua Newman & Emi Patmisari & Ida Widianingsih, 2022. "Policy analytical capacity and "Eastern" styles of policy analysis: evidence from West Java Province, Indonesia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 469-485, September.
    12. Yue Wang & Honggen Zhu & Noshaba Aziz & Yu Liu, 2023. "Does Social Capital Improve the Effectiveness of Public Service? An Insight from Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 431-452, January.
    13. Megan C Evans & Christopher Cvitanovic, 2018. "An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2024. "Collaborating for governance experiments on societal challenges: A dispositive process perspective," Post-Print hal-04644377, HAL.
    15. Hyensup Shim & Kiyoon Shin, 2021. "Empirical Analysis of Evidence-Based Policymaking in R&D Programmes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 0. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-30.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05240710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.