IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05173749.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Try, try again: Lessons learned from success and failure in participatory modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor Sterling

    (AMNH - American Museum of Natural History)

  • Moira Zellner

    (University of Illinois System)

  • Karen Jenni

    (US Geological Survey)

  • Kirsten Leong

    (Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center)

  • Pierre Glynn

    (US Geological Survey)

  • Todd Bendor

    (NC State - North Carolina State University [Raleigh] - UNC - University of North Carolina System)

  • Pierre Bommel

    (UPR GREEN - Gestion des ressources renouvelables et environnement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement)

  • Klaus Hubacek

    (Loyola University [Maryland, Baltimore])

  • Antonie Jetter

    (Portland State University)

  • Rebecca Jordan

    (Rutgers - Rutgers University System)

  • Laura Schmitt Olabisi

    (Michigan State University [East Lansing] - Michigan State University System)

  • Michael Paolisso

    (Loyola University [Maryland, Baltimore])

  • Steven Gray

    (Michigan State University [East Lansing] - Michigan State University System)

Abstract

Participatory Modeling (PM) is becoming increasingly common in environmental planning and conservation, due in part to advances in cyberinfrastructure as well as to greater recognition of the importance of engaging a diverse array of stakeholders in decision making. We provide lessons learned, based on over 200 years of the authors' cumulative and diverse experience, about PM processes. These include successful and, perhaps more importantly, not-so-successful trials. Our collective interdisciplinary background has supported the development, testing, and evaluation of a rich range of collaborative modeling approaches. We share here what we have learned as a community of participatory modelers, within three categories of reflection: a) lessons learned about participatory modelers; b) lessons learned about the context of collaboration; and c) lessons learned about the PM process. First, successful PM teams encompass a variety of skills beyond modeling expertise. Skills include: effective relationship-building, openness to learn from local experts, awareness of personal motivations and biases, and ability to translate discussions into models and to assess success. Second, the context for collaboration necessitates a culturally appropriate process for knowledge generation and use, for involvement of community co-leads, and for understanding group power dynamics that might influence how people from different backgrounds interact. Finally, knowing when to use PM and when not to, managing expectations, and effectively and equitably addressing conflicts is essential. Managing the participation process in PM is as important as managing the model building process. We recommend that PM teams consider what skills are present within a team, while ensuring inclusive creative space for collaborative exploration and learning supported by simple yet relevant models. With a realistic view of what it entails, PM can be a powerful approach that builds collective knowledge and social capital, thus helping communities to take charge of their future and address complex social and environmental problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor Sterling & Moira Zellner & Karen Jenni & Kirsten Leong & Pierre Glynn & Todd Bendor & Pierre Bommel & Klaus Hubacek & Antonie Jetter & Rebecca Jordan & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Michael Paolisso, 2019. "Try, try again: Lessons learned from success and failure in participatory modeling," Post-Print hal-05173749, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05173749
    DOI: 10.1525/elementa.347
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05173749v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05173749v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1525/elementa.347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05173749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.