IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05141238.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Business Administration Studies Offer Better Preparation for Supervisory Positions than Traditional Economics Studies?

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Heijke
  • Ger Ramaekers
  • Catherine Ris

    (LARJE - Laboratoire de Recherches Juridique et Economique - UNC - Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, UNC - Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie)

Abstract

The central theme of the paper is the question of whether graduates of business administration (BA) are better prepared for supervisory positions than non‐BA economics graduates and consequently have a greater chance of acquiring supervisory positions and, when they have such positions, earn more. In order to answer this question, we use a data‐set that relates to the labour market position of graduates from Dutch universities at the early stages of their careers. We find that BA graduates, despite their multidisciplinary education and the fact that they perceive fewer deficiencies in their education with respect to the ability for teamwork than non‐BA graduates, do not have a greater chance of acquiring supervisory positions than graduates from non‐BA economics courses. We also find that earnings in supervisory positions do not differ significantly between BA graduates and non‐BA graduates. The finding that most of the skills required for supervisory positions are acquired through work and not in education suggests that a combination of working and learning may be more effective for developing supervisory skills than a purely educational setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Heijke & Ger Ramaekers & Catherine Ris, 2006. "Do Business Administration Studies Offer Better Preparation for Supervisory Positions than Traditional Economics Studies?," Post-Print hal-05141238, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05141238
    DOI: 10.1080/09645290500073829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05141238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.