IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03969232.html

Stringency of environmental policy in China: When pollution drives bribery

Author

Listed:
  • Aude Pommeret

    (IREGE - Institut de Recherche en Gestion et en Economie - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

  • Xiaojun Yu

    (CUHK - City University of Hong Kong [Hong Kong])

  • Lin Zhang

    (CUHK - City University of Hong Kong [Hong Kong])

Abstract

This study provides a political economy explanation for the recently increased stringency of China's environmental policy. Specifically, we argue that prior to 2009, bribery from polluting firms was relatively successful in persuading local regulators to implement weak environmental policies. Since that time, pollution has reached a threshold that significantly changed regulators' objectives, leading them to refuse bribes, hence strengthening environmental policy. Thus, we built a theoretical general equilibrium model (with uncertainty about a pollution-induced catastrophe) in order to investigate the decision-making of local regulators. Using pollution and bribery data from China, we empirically confirmed the existence of a threshold for PM2.5 and calibrated our theoretical model. We showed that the current pollution level is higher than the optimal level of 9 μg/m3 that a forward-looking regulator would target (with a 1.5% risk of facing a pollution catastrophe). This suggests that the current pro-environmental activities of Chinese firms have been triggered by the changing behaviors of local regulators.

Suggested Citation

  • Aude Pommeret & Xiaojun Yu & Lin Zhang, 2022. "Stringency of environmental policy in China: When pollution drives bribery," Post-Print hal-03969232, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03969232
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Xin, 2025. "Regulation automation and green innovation: Evidence from China's industrial firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Yang, Yupeng & Chen, Xingxing & Li, Lidan & Song, Xianzhong, 2025. "Greening IPOs: An investigation of the impact of environmental verification on pollution reduction," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Yu, Xiaojun & Li, Qiang & Zhang, Lin, 2024. "Major government customer and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03969232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.