IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02195972.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards a Patent landscaping of Regenerative Medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Gorry

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Fabien Kawecki

Abstract

Regenerative medicine (RM) takes an increasingly important place in medical research. However, it is a heterogeneous research domain bringing together different scientific fields. The aim of this study is to characterize the patent landscape of this new research field, and its current trend using a patinformatics approach. We analyze the information embedded in patent database using text-mining techniques, data visualization and network analysis. In a landscape, one can observe trends of different technologies, rankings of actors, disposition of technology in geographical areas, collaborative patterns. Patenting in RM overlaps mainly with tissue engineering, stem cell, and biomaterials fields. These research fields are autonomous with small overlap between each other. Emerging trends such as bioprinting, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSc), tissue scaffolding, tissue regeneration and wound healing could be identified. Around 14000 family patents have been filed worldwide. Patents protection appeared sporadically in the early 1980s with biomaterial or wound healing patents filing. With the development of iPSc research in 2000-2005, the patent filing rate accelerated significantly. It is supported by new emerging invention trends ranging form a handful of patents to thousands of them. Ranking of applicants by country of patent filing show the supremacy of US and to a less extend China. If firms are present as patent assignee, the field is dominated by academic ownership of the inventions. The top leading applicant is the National Institute of Health (NIH, USA), and depending on the research subfields, we might be able to identify big pharma, biotech companies, Japanese or Korean universities or national public research organizations (CNRS or INSERM). Whatever the country origin of the applicants, they share a worldwide IP protection strategy with patent publications in North and South America, Europe, China, India and Australia. Finally, network analysis shows different pattern of collaborations according to the research subfields. While small world pattern of collaboration without danger of monopoly are identified for some emerging trends, one can observe network of collaboration centralized around public institution (mainly the NIH) of private institution (such as big pharma) for other emerging concepts. This patent map with the help of data visualization tools will improve the overall transparency of regenerative medicine to researchers, policy-markers and the civil society extending previous work on the scientific landscape of RM.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Gorry & Fabien Kawecki, 2016. "Towards a Patent landscaping of Regenerative Medicine," Post-Print hal-02195972, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02195972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaessler, Fabian & Hall, Bronwyn H. & Harhoff, Dietmar, 2021. "Should there be lower taxes on patent income?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02195972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.