IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02194592.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tail dependence risk exposure and diversification potential of Islamic and conventional banks

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Arreola Hernandez

    (ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Khamis Hamed Al-Yahyaee

    (SQU - Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Shawkat Hammoudeh

    (Drexel University)

  • Walid Mensi

    (SQU - Sultan Qaboos University)

Abstract

This paper undertakes a rolling window comparative analysis of risks for portfolios consisting of GCC Islamic and conventional bank indices. We draw our empirical results by employing canonical, drawable and regular vine copula models, as well as by implementing a portfolio optimization method with a conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. We find evidence of higher riskiness in the group of Islamic banks relative to the group of conventional banks across each of the financial rolling window scenarios under consideration. Specifically, a greater negative (nonlinear) tail asymmetric dependence is observed in the pairs of Islamic banks' relationships. The results also show that the optimal portfolio model supports a clear preference towards the group of conventional banks in regard to risk minimization and diversification benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Arreola Hernandez & Khamis Hamed Al-Yahyaee & Shawkat Hammoudeh & Walid Mensi, 2019. "Tail dependence risk exposure and diversification potential of Islamic and conventional banks," Post-Print hal-02194592, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02194592
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1602716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanif, Waqas & Mensi, Walid & Vo, Xuan Vinh & BenSaïda, Ahmed & Hernandez, Jose Arreola & Kang, Sang Hoon, 2023. "Dependence and risk management of portfolios of metals and agricultural commodity futures," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Khan, Abdullah & Rizvi, Syed Aun R. & Ali, Mohsin & Haroon, Omair, 2021. "A survey of Islamic finance research – Influences and influencers," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. M. Kabir Hassan & Md Nurul Islam Sohel & Tonmoy Choudhury & Mamunur Rashid, 2024. "A systematic literature review of risks in Islamic banking system: research agenda and future research directions," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 1-29, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02194592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.