IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00703720.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The joint distribution of stock returns is not elliptical

Author

Listed:
  • Rémy Chicheportiche

    (Science et Finance - Science et Finance, MAS - Mathématiques Appliquées aux Systèmes - EA 4037 - Ecole Centrale Paris, FiQuant - Chaire de finance quantitative - MICS - Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes - CentraleSupélec)

  • Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

    (Science et Finance - Science et Finance)

Abstract

Using a large set of daily US and Japanese stock returns, we test in detail the relevance of Student models, and of more general elliptical models, for describing the joint distribution of returns. We find that while Student copulas provide a good approximation for strongly correlated pairs of stocks, systematic discrepancies appear as the linear correlation between stocks decreases, that rule out all elliptical models. Intuitively, the failure of elliptical models can be traced to the inadequacy of the assumption of a single volatility mode for all stocks. We suggest several ideas of methodological interest to efficiently visualise and compare different copulas. We identify the rescaled difference with the Gaussian copula and the central value of the copula as strongly discriminating observables. We insist on the need to shun away from formal choices of copulas with no financial interpretation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rémy Chicheportiche & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2012. "The joint distribution of stock returns is not elliptical," Post-Print hal-00703720, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00703720
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219024912500197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan Raimana Chan & Thomas Huckle & Antoine Jacquier & Aitor Muguruza, 2021. "Portfolio optimisation with options," Papers 2111.12658, arXiv.org.
    2. Petr Koldanov & Nina Lozgacheva, 2016. "Multiple Testing Of Sign Symmetry For Stock Return Distributions," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(08), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Fung, Thomas & Seneta, Eugene, 2014. "Convergence rate to a lower tail dependence coefficient of a skew-t distribution," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 62-72.
    4. Gambacciani, Marco & Paolella, Marc S., 2017. "Robust normal mixtures for financial portfolio allocation," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 91-111.
    5. Lasko Basnarkov & Viktor Stojkoski & Zoran Utkovski & Ljupco Kocarev, 2019. "Option Pricing With Heavy-Tailed Distributions Of Logarithmic Returns," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-35, November.
    6. Donald Geman & H'elyette Geman & Nassim Nicholas Taleb, 2014. "Tail Risk Constraints and Maximum Entropy," Papers 1412.7647, arXiv.org.
    7. Koldanov, A. & Koldanov, P. & Semenov, D., 2021. "Confidence set for connected stocks of stock market," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 12-34.
    8. Bücher Axel & Jaser Miriam & Min Aleksey, 2021. "Detecting departures from meta-ellipticity for multivariate stationary time series," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 121-140, January.
    9. Simon Hediger & Jeffrey Näf & Marc S. Paolella & Paweł Polak, 2023. "Heterogeneous tail generalized common factor modeling," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 389-420, June.
    10. Broda, Simon A. & Krause, Jochen & Paolella, Marc S., 2018. "Approximating expected shortfall for heavy-tailed distributions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 184-203.
    11. Petr Koldanov, 2019. "Testing new property of elliptical model for stock returns distribution," Papers 1907.10306, arXiv.org.
    12. Fung, Thomas & Seneta, Eugene, 2016. "Tail asymptotics for the bivariate skew normal," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 129-138.
    13. R'emy Chicheportiche & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2013. "A nested factor model for non-linear dependences in stock returns," Papers 1309.3102, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00703720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.