IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/hal-01286810.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La mise en œuvre de l'article 19 du règlement CEE 797/85 en France et en Grande-Bretagne

Author

Listed:
  • François Facchini

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper compares the French and the British application of article 19 of EC Directive 797/85. It shows that France was very slow in this application. But UK had quickly financed the management agreement. France was opposed to management agreement, and this was shown by : small size of the surface area under contract, slightness of the budget allowed and hight delay in the implementation of the law. The difference between French and british responses to the article 19 of EC Directive is explained by the way the regulating was drawn up. France was delayed, but this country was inforced to implement the article 19. On the one hand, because from the beginning France, as all the other members of EEC, was financing part of the subsidies. On the second hand, because all the countries of EC were inforced to implement the article. However, France always favores the balance between districts and this before taking care of environment quality. This way French administration uses the article 19 to subsidize some districts. So, an european policy can have different aims and different implementations from one country to an other.

Suggested Citation

  • François Facchini, 1999. "La mise en œuvre de l'article 19 du règlement CEE 797/85 en France et en Grande-Bretagne," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01286810, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-01286810
    DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.1999.5094
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01286810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01286810/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecoru.1999.5094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. R. Harvey & K. J. Thomson, 1985. "Costs, Benefits and the Future of the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. GAIGNE, Carl & LAROCHE DUPRAZ, Cathie & MATTHEWS, Alan, 2015. "Thirty years of European research on international trade in food and agricultural products," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    2. François Facchini, 1995. "La qualité de l’environnement, nouvel enjeu de la réforme de la politique agricole commune," Post-Print hal-01350619, HAL.
    3. François Facchini, 1999. "La mise en œuvre de l'article 19 du règlement CEE 797/85 en France et en Grande-Bretagne," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 252(1), pages 3-8.
    4. Baisakova, Nurzat & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2015. "Aspekte der Agrarpolitik 2014," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(Supplemen), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-01286810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.