IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/hal-00306212.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efficacité comparée des instruments de régulation environnementale

Author

Listed:
  • Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline

    () (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics)

Abstract

Les effets externes tels que les gaz à effet de serre peuvent entraîner des coûts très élevés pour la société dans son ensemble alors qu'ils sont le fait de certains agents économiques qui ne paient pas les coûts de ces effets. La comparaison de l'efficacité des différents instruments de régulation environnementale est un problème aux multiples facettes. La supériorité souvent alléguée des instruments économiques sur les instruments réglementaires est générale sans être pourtant systématique, dépendant en particulier des imperfections de l'information ou de la concurrence. L'argument de l'efficacité ne suffit pas toujours à imposer l'utilisation d'un instrument là où des considérations d'acceptabilité prévalent.

Suggested Citation

  • Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2007. "Efficacité comparée des instruments de régulation environnementale," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00306212, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-00306212
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00306212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00306212/document
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delacote, Philippe & Montagné-Huck, Claire, 2012. "Political consumerism and public policy: Good complements against market failures?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 188-193.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    externalités; taxe environnementale; permis d'émission négociables; efficacité dynamique; norme; incitation à innover;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-00306212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.