IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

An analysis of Protected Geographic Indications (PGI\'s) that seek commonalities while respecting specificities (In French)

  • Bernard JULLIEN (E3i, IFReDE-GRES)
  • Andy SMITH (CERVL, IEP Bordeaux)
Registered author(s):

    To address a gap in the literature that deals with official quality labels, the article proposes a methodology for analysis and a conceptual framework that are subsequently applied to two such quality labels from the south west region of France : ‘Volaille Fermières des Landes’ and ‘Jambon de Bayonne’. The proposed framework seeks to facilitate a comparative and historical analysis that will allow general lessons to be derived from a detailed study of individual configurations. To do so, the research question regarding the creation and development of these labels is positioned in the economic and political spheres. This allows for an examination of both the means of productive organisation and the means of legitimacy that are mobilised by the industry sectors that are concerned by such quality labels as PGI (Protected Geographic Indicator). The authors consider the PGI labels are linked to sectors or sub-sectors of activity whose structure can be interpreted using four basic conventions: effort, quality, state and finance. These conventions are declined more or less specifically depending on the sector or sub-sector. The analysis of the PGI labels thus focuses on the specificities of the interpretation of these conventions in each case in order to determine the degree of continuity and/or discontinuity that the adoption of the label entails. When applied to the two cases and their recent evolutions, the framework highlights in particular the key role of the quality convention. Destabilising this convention emerges as a major factor leading to economic and political restructuring of the sector concerned.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://cahiersdugres.u-bordeaux4.fr/2004/2004-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales in its series Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) with number 2004-07.

    as
    in new window

    Length:
    Date of creation: 2004
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:grs:wpegrs:2004-07
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://gres.u-bordeaux4.fr/

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:grs:wpegrs:2004-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vincent Frigant)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.