IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

China: Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations


  • Agarwala, R.


Since 1979, the Chinese authorities have made a sustained effort at introducing market-oriented reforms and the results have been impressive in terms of growth and poverty reduction. However, reform of fiscal system has lagged behind. In particular, the system of intergovernmental fiscal relations has been unstable, non-transparent, and inequitable. As the economy moves toward greater market orientation, a rule-based system of intergovernmental fiscal relations will be essential. The paper reviews the theory and experience of multilevel fiscal systems in various countries and makes some suggestions for China. Its basic conclusion is that while recognizing the specificities of Chinese conditions, the Chinese authorities cannot but follow some basic principles of multilevel fiscal systems. Among these are the following. First, international experience in countries big and small, federal and unitary, indicates that the Central Government must have effective control over the most important sources of tax revenue, not only in termks of tax law and policy, but also in terms of administration, collection, and allocation of revenue. Second, taxes should not be looked upon mainly as providers of revenue; they must also be seen as tools of policy that, whether intended or not, affect the allocation of resources and their efficient utilization, interregional and interpersonal distribution, and the level of aggregate demand. Third, while for the sake of efficiency and equity most of the major taxes have to be collected centrally, a considerabled egree of decentralization is required on the expenditure side because closeness to the beneficiary helps efficiency. There is thus a need for designing a system for transfer of resources from the center to the localities, but it needs to be done in a way that is transparent and equitable and gives incentives to the localities to maximize their efforts for revenue mobilization. The paper details the practices followed by Japan, India, Ca
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Agarwala, R., 1992. "China: Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations," World Bank - Discussion Papers 178, World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:wobadi:178

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Sylviane GUILLAUMONT JEANNENEY & Ping HUA, 2000. "Ouverture économique et dépenses publiques en Chine : une analyse régionale," Working Papers 200006, CERDI.
    2. Zhang, Tao & Zou, Heng-fu, 2001. "The growth impact of intersectoral and intergovernmental allocation of public expenditure: With applications to China and India," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 58-81.
    3. Andres Rodriguez-Pose & Nicholas Gill, 2005. "On the 'economic dividend' of devolution," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 405-420.
    4. David Wildasin, 1996. "Introduction: Fiscal Aspects of Evolving Federations," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 3(2), pages 121-135, May.
    5. Era Dabla-Norris, 2005. "Issues in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in China," IMF Working Papers 05/30, International Monetary Fund.
    6. John Knight & Li Shi, 1999. "Fiscal decentralization: Incentives, redistribution and reform in China," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 5-32.
    7. Ma, Jun, 1995. "Modelling central-local fiscal relations in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 105-136.
    8. repec:taf:apeclt:v:24:y:2017:i:19:p:1403-1407 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item


    fiscal policy;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:wobadi:178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.