How Reliable Are VAR Estimates of Responses to Monetary bPolicy Shocks?
We study the reliability of the estimated responses of major economic aggregates to monetary policy shocks. We investigate the bias of the estimated impulse response functions and the reliability of their qualitative features such as their sign and shape and the timing of peaks and troughs. We also study the coverage accuracy of the corresponding pointwise confidence intervals. This simulation study is the first of its kind to focus on large-dimensional VAR models with many lags. Our data generating processes are based on VAR models estimated by leading practitioners in the field. In contrast, existing studies have largely focused on artificial bivariate VAR(1) models without economic interpretation. We find that in general qualitative features of impulse response functions are not estimated reliably. There are only minor differences in coverage accuracy between the intervals proposed by Kilian (1998a) and Sims and Zha (1995). Both intervals tend to be more accurate than the asymptotic delta method, but somewhat erratic. Poor coverage accuracy is associated with bias in the impulse response point estimates. In particular, impulse response point estimates and confidence intervals both tend to understate systematically the magnitude of the true output response to a monetary tightening.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1998|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL THEORY, ANN ARBOR MICHIGAN U.S.A.|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:michet:98-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.