IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fiu/wpaper/1202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do immigrant outflows lead to native inflows? An empirical analysis of the migratory responses to US state immigration legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Good

    () (Department of Economics, Florida International University)

Abstract

I estimate the impact on population and employment for 52 different demographic groups of the recent in?ux of state omnibus immigration laws targeting undocumented immigrants in the United States. I ?nd evidence that while the demographic groups pinpointed as having higher percentages of undocumented individuals certainly experience population and employment ¡¯out?ows¡¯ from states implementing these immigration laws, there is a lack of associated ¡¯in?ows¡¯ for those demographic groups identi?ed by economic theory as being probable substitutes for undocumented immigrants. Several segments designated as probable substitutes actually experience an adverse effect on population and employment. This ?nding provides rigorous empirical backing to existing anecdotal evidence of the same migratory phenomenon, resulting in clear policy implications in relation to the ongoing debate over immigration.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Good, 2012. "Do immigrant outflows lead to native inflows? An empirical analysis of the migratory responses to US state immigration legislation," Working Papers 1202, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:fiu:wpaper:1202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics.fiu.edu/research/working-papers/2012/do-immigrant-outflows-lead-to-native-inflows-an-empirical-analysis-of-the-migratory-responses-to-us/michael-good-applied-economics-special-issue.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Borjas & Jeffrey Grogger & Gordon H. Hanson, 2008. "Imperfect Substitution between Immigrants and Natives: A Reappraisal," NBER Working Papers 13887, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes & Fernando Antonio Lozano, 2014. "On the Effectiveness of SB1070 in Arizona," CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1423, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), Department of Economics, University College London.
    2. repec:spr:jopoec:v:31:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00148-017-0666-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Sarah Bohn & Magnus Lofstrom & Steven Raphael, 2015. "Do E-verify mandates improve labor market outcomes of low-skilled native and legal immigrant workers?," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 81(4), pages 960-979, April.
    4. Michael Good, 2012. "How Localized is the Pro-trade Effect of Immigration? Evidence from Mexico and the United States," Working Papers 1203, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    5. Christoph Albert, 2017. "The Labor Market Impact of Undocumented Immigrants: Job Creation vs. Job Competition," CESifo Working Paper Series 6575, CESifo Group Munich.
    6. Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina & Puttitanun, Thitima, 2017. "Undocumented Youth in Limbo: The Impact of America’s Immigration Enforcement Policy on Juvenile Deportations," GLO Discussion Paper Series 99, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    7. Orrenius, Pia M. & Zavodny, Madeline, 2014. "How Do E-Verify Mandates Affect Unauthorized Immigrant Workers?," IZA Discussion Papers 7992, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
    8. Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes & Fernando Lozano, 2015. "On The Effectiveness Of Sb1070 In Arizona," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(1), pages 335-351, January.
    9. Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina & Lozano, Fernando A., 2017. "Interstate Mobility Patterns of Likely Unauthorized Immigrants: Evidence from Arizona," IZA Discussion Papers 10685, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fiu:wpaper:1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sheng Guo). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/defiuus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.