IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fau/wpaper/wp2011_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reflections on the reconciliation problem

Author

Abstract

This paper deals with the so called problem of reconciliation, a contentious and puzzling issue in Post Keynesian monetary theory. The crux of the matter is the question of mechanisms that would reconcile the loan-created supply of deposits with the willingness of agents to hold these deposits. The paper reviews and comments on the solutions proposed so far and argues that the reconciliation problem might not be eliminated entirely. The argument is twofold. First, it is argued that the income multiplier and Kaldor-Trevithick reflux mechanism cannot do the trick. Second, certain factors affecting the mechanism based on changes in relative interest rate differentials are identified that might preclude the mechanism from working as envisaged by its proponents. If this is the case, what we are left with is the concept of convenience lending.

Suggested Citation

  • Ondøej Lopušník, 2011. "Reflections on the reconciliation problem," Working Papers IES 2011/12, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Apr 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2011_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/default/file/download/id/16317
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    convenience lending; endogenous money; Post Keynesian economics; reconciliation problem;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B50 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - General
    • E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian; Modern Monetary Theory
    • E51 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2011_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Svarcova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icunicz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.