IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fau/wpaper/wp2007_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Instituce státní úvěrové podpory v České republice [available in Czech only]

Author

Abstract

Práce se zabývá popisem českých institucí podporujících úvěry poskytované malým a středním podnikatelům, zemědělcům a vývozcům. Analyzovanými institucemi jsou Exportní garanční a pojišťovací společnost, Česká exportní banka, Českomoravská záruční a rozvojová banka a Podpůrný a garanční rolnický a lesnický fond. Popisované aktivity těchto českých institucí jsou dány do obecného kontextu rozvojového a garančního bankovnictví, společné zemědělské politiky EU a mezinárodního rámce exportního úvěrování a pojištění. Zvláštní část je věnována i operačním programům Evropské unie.

Suggested Citation

  • Karel Janda, 2007. "Instituce státní úvěrové podpory v České republice [available in Czech only]," Working Papers IES 2007/20, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Jun 2007.
    • Handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2007_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/default/file/download/id/5752
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wadim Strielkowski, 2006. "People of the Road: the Role of Ethnic Origin in Migration Decisions. A Study of Slovak Roma Asylum-Seekers in the Czech Republic in 1998-2006," Working Papers IES 2006/32, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Dec 2006.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Janíčko & Ivo Koubek, 2012. "Informační asymetrie a systém dvojího standardu ve vztahu zdravotník - pacient [Information Assymetry and Double Standard in the Doctor-Patient Relationship]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(3), pages 362-379.
    2. Jana Chvalkovská & Petr Janský & Jiří Skuhrovec, 2012. "Listinné akcie na majitele a veřejné zakázky [Bearer Shares in Paper Form and Public Procurement]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(3), pages 349-361.
    3. Karel Janda, 2008. "Government Support of the Czech Export Credit [Státní podpora českých vývozních úvěrů]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(1), pages 62-75.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miloslav Vošvrda & Jan Kodera, 2007. "Goodwin's Predator-Prey Model with Endogenous Technological Progress," Working Papers IES 2007/09, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Jan 2007.
    2. Martin Gregor, 2008. "Markets vs. politics: correcting erroneous beliefs differently," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Explorations in Austrian Economics, pages 55-78, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Ondrej Schneider, 2007. "The EU Budget Dispute – A Blessing in Disguise?," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 57(7-8), pages 304-323, September.
    4. Martin Gregor, 2007. "The Pros and Cons of Banking Socialism," Working Papers IES 2007/03, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Jan 2007.
    5. Adam Geršl, 2007. "Foreign Banks, Foreign Lending and Cross-Border Contagion: Evidence from the BIS Data," Working Papers IES 2007/08, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Jan 2007.
    6. Alexis Derviz, 2007. "Modeling Electronic FX Brokerage as a Fast Order-Driven Marketunder Heterogeneous Private Values and Information," Working Papers IES 2007/16, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised May 2007.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Úvěr; státní podpora; dotace; garance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2007_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Svarcova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icunicz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.