IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eyd/cp2013/276.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Temel İnsan Sermayesi Modeli: Türkiye Örneği

Author

Listed:
  • Çelik, Orkun

    (Gumushane University, Department of Economics, Gumushane, Turkey)

  • Selim, Sibel

    (Celal Bayar University, Department of Econometrics, Manisa, Turkey)

Abstract

Ücret farklılıkları konusu, Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülkelerin emek piyasalarında sıkça rastlanan bir sorun olmaktadır. Oluşan bu ücret farklılıkları, piyasa aksaklıklarından kaynaklanabildiği gibi bireylerin nitelik farklılıklarından da kaynaklanabilmektedir. Özellikle kırsal ve kentsel kesimdeki çalışanların eğitim, sağlık hizmetlerine erişimlerinin farklı olması, kalkınma düzeylerindeki farklılıklar ve daha birçok nedenden dolayı bireysel gelir farklılıkları oluşmaktadır. Bireysel nitelik farklılıklarından oluşan ücret farklılıkları, İnsan Sermayesi Teorisi’nde genişçe yer bulmaktadır. Oluşan nitelik farklılığı ücretlere zamanla yansımakta ve bireyler arasında gelir farklılıklarına yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışmada amaç, Türkiye geneli, kentsel ve kırsal kesimdeki kamu ve özel sektörde çalışan kadın ve erkekler arasında oluşan gelir farklılıklarının analiz edilmesidir. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK)’nun hazırlamış olduğu 2011 yılı Hanehalkı İşgücü Araştırması mikro veri seti kullanılarak elde edilen En Küçük Kareler (OLS) ve Kantil Regresyon (QR) model sonuçları karşılaştırılmıştır. İşgücü piyasasındaki ücret farklılıkları ve QR modeli kapsamında literatürde yapılmış olan çalışmalar sayıca sınırlıdır. Bu çalışma, sınırlı olan literatüre hem temel insan sermayesi hem de genişletilmiş modeller açısından katkıda bulunacaktır.Keywords: Ücret farklılıkları, İnsan Sermayesi Teorisi, Kantil Regresyon Yaklaşımı

Suggested Citation

  • Çelik, Orkun & Selim, Sibel, 2013. "Temel İnsan Sermayesi Modeli: Türkiye Örneği," EY International Congress on Economics I (EYC2013), October 24-25, 2013, Ankara, Turkey 276, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:eyd:cp2013:276
    Note: [English Title] Basic Human Capital Theory: The Case of Turkey [English Abstract] The topic of wage differentials is a frequently problem in the labor markets of developing countries such as Turkey. These wage differentials can arise from the market imperfections as well as the individual quality differences. Individual wage differences are arise from the differences at the rural and urban areas employees’ access to the education, the health services and the level of development and the other reasons. Wage differences arising from the individual quality differences find a large place in The Human Capital Theory. These quality differences reflect on wages over time and lead to income differences between the individuals. The aim of this study is to analyze income differences between male and female employees for public and private sector in rural and urban areas in Turkey. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Quantile Regression (QR) Models results by using TURKSTAT’s Household Labor Force Survey micro data set of 2011 are comparatively discussed. Number of studies that have been made in the literature under the QR model and wage differentials in the labor market has limited. This study will contribute to the limited literature in terms of basic human capital as well as the extended models [English Keywords] Wage Differentials, Human Capital Theory, Quantile Regression Approach
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekonomikyaklasim.org/eyc2013/?download=Paper%20276.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ücret farklılıkları; i̇nsan sermayesi teorisi; kantil regresyon yaklaşımı;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eyd:cp2013:276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ozan Eruygur (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekonomikyaklasim.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.