IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/reconx/p0042.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On Political Representation: Myths and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Pollak, Jozef Bátora, Monika Mokre, Emmanuel Sigalas
  • Peter Slominski

Abstract

In this paper we critically reassess the standard account of political representation, in order to question the mythical foundation of its premises and explain why it can no longer serve as an adequate explanatory framework in the modern political context. We argue that representation was not invented as a second-best solution, that the represented are not always a collective of individuals, that there is an indirect rather than direct link between the represented and the representatives, that representatives can be legitimately chosen by methods other than elections and, finally, that good representation cannot be reduced to responsiveness. Despite the inconsistencies of different theories of representation, the standard account survived long enough for reasons we explain in this paper. The consolidation of the EU as a supranational political arena and the burgeoning activity of transnational actors resulted in a multiplication of structures and opportunities for political representation which seriously challenges the effectiveness and suitability of the standard representation model. Growing complexity, diminishing transparency and the prospect of competing representative claims from concurrent majorities create a volatile dynamic for the future of democracy at both national and EU level.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Pollak, Jozef Bátora, Monika Mokre, Emmanuel Sigalas & Peter Slominski, 2009. "On Political Representation: Myths and Challenges," RECON Online Working Papers Series 3, RECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0903.pdf?fileitem=16662583
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    accountability; democracy; democratization; legitimacy; multilevel governance; political representation; supranationalism;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marit Eldholm). General contact details of provider: http://www.reconproject.eu .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.