IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002625/2830.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Real Unit labor costs differentials in EMU: How big, how benign and how reversible?

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Lebrun
  • Esther Pérez

Abstract

This paper investigates the factors underlying the dispersion in RULC growth rates across euro area countries. It addresses three main questions. First, how big are RULC growth differentials in EMU by historical perspective? Second, what are the reasons underlying such differentials and why does growth dispersion remain after the start of EMU? Third, how can policy narrow such differentials? The theoretical model takes as a starting point a monotonic relationship between RULC and the capital-output ratio under the assumptions of perfect competition and a CES technology. Factors displacing this schedule are subsequently introduced, including changes in the price of intermediate inputs, markups of prices over marginal costs, union bargaining power and labor adjustment costs. A log-linear version of the model is then estimated on a panel of 11 euro-area countries ranging from 1980 to 2008. According to our empirical findings, persistent RULC growth differentials can be attributed to divergent evolutions in capital-output ratios, nominal effective exchange rates and country-specific institutional features, coupled with an increased sensitivity of RULC to fundamentals following the shift in the monetary regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Lebrun & Esther Pérez, 2011. "Real Unit labor costs differentials in EMU: How big, how benign and how reversible?," EcoMod2011 2830, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002625:2830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Paper%20Lebrun-Perez%20Final.docx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Lebre de Freitas & Miguel de Faria e Castro, 2014. "The Portuguese real exchange rate, 1995-2010: competitiveness or price effects?," NIPE Working Papers 12/2014, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    2. Elias Sanidas, 2014. "The Greek Non-Paradigm of Economic and Business Development, and Comparisons with South Korea," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 64(3), pages 30-48, July-Sept.
    3. Indermit Gill & Johannes Koettl & Truman Packard, 2013. "Full employment: a distant dream for Europe," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-34, December.
    4. Dimitris Doulos & Odysseus Katsaitis & George Zombanakis, 2020. "Is the emphasis on unit labor costs an effective export-promoting policy? A comparison between Greece and Portugal," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(3), pages 393-410, September.
    5. Pietro Cova & Lisa Rodano, 2019. "Relative price dynamics in the Euro area: where do we stand?," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1226, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    6. Yuming Cui & Changrong Lu, 2018. "Are China's unit labour costs still competitive? A comparison with ASEAN countries," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 32(1), pages 59-76, May.
    7. Claudia M. Buch, 2013. "From the Stability Pact to ESM - What Next?," Chapters, in: Andreas Dombret & Otto Lucius (ed.), Stability of the Financial System, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Jorge Silva, 2017. "Are external accounts sustainable in Portugal?," Working Papers REM 2017/21, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002625:2830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.