IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eim/papers/n200513.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants of self-employment preference and realisation of women and men in Europe and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Roy Thurik
  • Ingrid Verheul
  • Isabel Grilo

Abstract

This study has investigated the factors influencing the probability of women and men to be(come) self-employed. Starting from a lower self-employment preference combined with a lower self-employment prevalence rate for women, the present paper sets out to investigate the underlying mechanisms behind these gender differences, distinguishing between different ways in which gender can exert influence on selfemployment (preference). Findings show evidence of moderating and indirect effects of gender. An important finding is that the lower self-employment rate for women may largely be attributed to their lower self-employment preference. An update version of the report is published on 5 dec. 2006: research paper H200622.

Suggested Citation

  • Roy Thurik & Ingrid Verheul & Isabel Grilo, 2006. "Determinants of self-employment preference and realisation of women and men in Europe and the United States," Scales Research Reports N200513, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:eim:papers:n200513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.entrepreneurship-sme.eu/pdf-ez/N200513.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dominik Buttler & Eva Sierminska, 2020. "Career or Flexible Work Arrangements? Gender Differences in Self-employment in a Young Market Economy," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 70-95, March.
    2. Nahikari Irastorza & Inaki Pena, 2014. "Immigrant Entrepreneurship: Does the Liability of Foreignness Matter?," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eim:papers:n200513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster EIM (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eimbpnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.