IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/137763.html

Global inequalities in stroke rehabilitation: system capacity, workforce, and access in low- and middle-income countries

Author

Listed:
  • Boettger, Priyanka
  • Juenemann, Martin
  • Buerke, Michael
  • Agarwal, Ayush
  • Omar, Omar Alhaj

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review examines global inequalities in stroke rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It aims to identify key system-level determinants, including access to services, workforce capacity, financing, and policy frameworks—that contribute to disparities in post-stroke rehabilitation and long-term outcomes. Recent findings: Recent research demonstrates a growing mismatch between rehabilitation needs and service availability in LMICs. Persistent barriers include severe shortages of trained rehabilitation professionals, inadequate infrastructure, fragmented care pathways, and high out-of-pocket expenditures. Although task shifting, community-based rehabilitation, family-mediated therapy, and telerehabilitation have been introduced to mitigate these gaps, evidence for their scalability and sustained effectiveness remains heterogeneous. Summary: Stroke rehabilitation inequities in LMICs primarily reflect structural health system constraints rather than lack of therapeutic efficacy. Sustainable improvement requires integration of rehabilitation into universal health coverage, investment in workforce development, and strengthened post-acute care pathways. These findings highlight priorities for future implementation and health system research.

Suggested Citation

  • Boettger, Priyanka & Juenemann, Martin & Buerke, Michael & Agarwal, Ayush & Omar, Omar Alhaj, 2026. "Global inequalities in stroke rehabilitation: system capacity, workforce, and access in low- and middle-income countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 137763, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:137763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/137763/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:137763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.