IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/137281.html

When less is more: emergency department staffing in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Reid, Eleanor
  • Su, Huifeng
  • Dilip, Monisha
  • Babalis, Dimitrios
  • Karametos, Ilias
  • Plasati, Maria
  • Patrikakou, Anna
  • Vildiridi, Lilian Venetia
  • Ulrich, Andrew
  • Tsiftsis, Dimitrios

Abstract

Background Greece is a high-income country with over 10 million residents, approximately three times that many annual tourist visits, and about 150,000 refugees from the Middle East. Despite these demands, it has an underdeveloped Emergency Medicine (EM) system, contributing to challenges in access, care quality, system efficiency, and cost. This study aims to: (1) report current staffing in Greek Emergency Departments (EDs), (2) model ED throughput comparing EM-trained and non-EM-trained providers, and (3) propose a national EM dissemination strategy. Methods Staffing and operational data were collected from four representative public EDs in Greece: Nikaia, Volos, Lárisa, and Santorini. Facilities varied in physician coverage (0–5 attendings). We compared potential EM- versus non-EM-trained physician throughput. The only difference between provider types was compatibility with patient demand—EM-trained physicians could manage all chief complaints, while non-EM physicians handled a subset based on their specialty. Other factors like bandwidth (max concurrent patients) and speed (patients/hour) were held constant based on available and recognized standards. An expert panel was convened to propose a national strategy for EM dissemination. Results Across sites, physician-to-patient ratios ranged from 1:20 to 1:32, with 1–2% of arrivals classified as critically ill. Admission rates ranged from 16 to 20% (6% in Santorini); 23–28% of patients required specialty consultation. Average ED length of stay ranged from 4.5 to 6.2 hours. Simulations demonstrated that EM-trained staffing reduced physician needs by 53%, driven by a 10.95% increase in throughput (mean 7.83%; 95% CI: 14.2%). Fewer EM-trained attendings were needed (mean reduction 7.26%; 95% CI: 12.47%). These findings likely underestimate benefit, as downstream improvements in quality, access to specialty care, and reduced staffing burden from residents were not modeled. Notably, the lower the staffing level, the greater the benefit of EM-trained physicians. The expert panel endorsed a hub-and-spoke model centered on a national EM center of excellence, launching the first EM residency. With yearly expansion to university hospitals, this model could produce 1500 EM-trained physicians in 10–15 years. Conclusion Our model predicts that EM-trained staffing would improve operational efficiency, reduce staffing needs, and potentially yield system-wide benefits and cost savings for the Greek healthcare system.

Suggested Citation

  • Reid, Eleanor & Su, Huifeng & Dilip, Monisha & Babalis, Dimitrios & Karametos, Ilias & Plasati, Maria & Patrikakou, Anna & Vildiridi, Lilian Venetia & Ulrich, Andrew & Tsiftsis, Dimitrios, 2026. "When less is more: emergency department staffing in Greece," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 137281, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:137281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/137281/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:137281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.