IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/130906.html

Narrow formalisation: informal workers, social protection and digital registration in India

Author

Listed:
  • Sinha, Harshita
  • Gallien, Max
  • Van Den Boogaard, Vanessa

Abstract

Over the last decade, there has been growing global pressure to build digitised social protection systems as a means of enhancing access to welfare. This article explores one such case: ‘e-Shram’, a digital registration platform introduced in India in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging as a direct consequence of the hardships faced by informal workers during the pandemic, the article examines e-Shram in this context. It observes that while e-Shram is increasingly portrayed as the first step towards a comprehensive formalisation programme, it fails to address the main gaps and issues highlighted by the pandemic; it provides some registration but maintains substantial deficiencies in service provision. This case study underscores why formalisation should be understood as a multidimensional process, and consequently, why it is important to separate it from particular instances of ‘narrow formalisation’ – commonly formalisations of governance, but not necessarily of work. This analysis carries broader implications for countries pursuing formalisation through digital platforms, emphasising the need for policies that align state objectives with genuine improvements in social and economic protections for informal workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinha, Harshita & Gallien, Max & Van Den Boogaard, Vanessa, 2026. "Narrow formalisation: informal workers, social protection and digital registration in India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 130906, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/130906/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.