IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/130788.html

Socioeconomic inequality and access to emergency care: understanding the pathways to the emergency department in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Madia, Joan
  • Boyle, Adrian A.
  • Ray, James
  • Novak, Alex
  • Pope, Catherine J.
  • Wheeler, Bella
  • Petrou, Stavros
  • Wittenberg, Raphael
  • Nicodemo, Catia

Abstract

Objective To examine how socioeconomic deprivation influences referral pathways to emergency departments (EDs) and to assess how these pathways affect subsequent hospital outcomes. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting Emergency department of a large teaching hospital in the East of England, providing secondary and tertiary care. Participants 482787 ED attendances by patients aged 16 years and over, recorded between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were assigned Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) deciles based on residential postcode. Main outcome measures Referral source (general practitioner (GP), National Health Service (NHS) 111, ambulance, self-referral, other), total ED time, 4-hour breach, hospital admission and unplanned return within 72 hours. Results Substantial socioeconomic inequalities were observed in referral pathways. Patients from the most deprived areas were significantly less likely to be referred by a GP (4.7%) than those from the least deprived areas (14.7%) and more likely to arrive via ambulance (32% vs 24%). These differences persisted after adjusting for demographic, clinical and contextual variables. Ambulance referrals showed the longest ED stays, ranging from 347 to 351 min across IMD deciles (overall 95%CI 343 to 363) and the highest probability of 4-hour breaches (51%; 95%CI 50% to 53%). Self-referrals had the greatest rates of unplanned returns within 7 days (up to 7.1%; 95%CI 5.5% to 8.7%). In contrast, NHS 111 and GP referrals were associated with shorter stays, lower breach rates and fewer reattendances. Minimal variation in outcomes was observed across deprivation levels once referral source was accounted for. Conclusions Inequalities in how patients access emergency care, particularly reduced GP and NHS 111 referrals among more deprived groups, appear to underpin disparities in ED outcomes. Referral source captures important clinical and system-level factors that influence patient experience and resource use. Interventions to improve equitable access to structured referral pathways, particularly in more deprived areas, may enhance both the efficiency and fairness of emergency care delivery. Further research using national data is needed to assess broader policy implications and economic costs associated with differential access.

Suggested Citation

  • Madia, Joan & Boyle, Adrian A. & Ray, James & Novak, Alex & Pope, Catherine J. & Wheeler, Bella & Petrou, Stavros & Wittenberg, Raphael & Nicodemo, Catia, 2025. "Socioeconomic inequality and access to emergency care: understanding the pathways to the emergency department in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 130788, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/130788/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.