IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/129813.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Imposing immobility and making mobility: an infrastructural reading of Beijing’s impactful but ineffective temporal mode of COVID governance

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Liqiao

Abstract

This study examines China’s COVID governance through the case of Beijing from April to June 2022. To manage the biopolitical paradox between mobility and immobility brought forward by the pandemic, the Chinese state mobilised a temporal mode of COVID governance, implementing drastic containment measures aimed at ‘zeroing out’ viruses in the shortest possible time while minimising socio-economic cost. This approach entailed imposing immobility and making mobility according to the specific temporal—spatial arrangements of time—space compression in a state of exception, within which a spatial configuration of simultaneity for infrastructural intervention emerged. However, the two groups of infrastructures deployed for these purposes ultimately generated excessive socio-economic costs, while achieving ‘zeroing out’ over an extended period, revealing Beijing’s impactful but ineffective COVID governance. This outcome invites reflection on how China’s temporal mode of governance was enacted and reciprocally challenged by the very infrastructures deployed as its instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Liqiao, 2025. "Imposing immobility and making mobility: an infrastructural reading of Beijing’s impactful but ineffective temporal mode of COVID governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129813, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/129813/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.