IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/128184.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crisis management in the pharmaceutical industry during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Latonen, S.
  • Pussila, S.
  • Seeck, Hannele
  • Airaksinen, M.
  • Juppo, A. M.

Abstract

Despite the vulnerabilities of the pharmaceutical industry and its critical role in functioning healthcare systems, no previous crisis management theory–based empirical studies focusing on this field during the COVID-19 pandemic has been published. The present study aims to fill this gap and identify areas for development to improve future crisis preparedness. Organisational crisis management process models provided a theoretical framework. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted during the second wave of the pandemic (October–November 2020). This online survey was developed based on the crisis management process models and sent to managing directors working in the pharmaceutical and wholesale companies (n = 73) in Finland. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and open-field responses were analysed qualitatively using content analysis. Nine semi-structured interviews with industry leaders and managers conducted in March–May 2021 were utilised in data triangulation. The results revealed that crisis preparedness improved concurrently during the pandemic due to increased risk perception, updated preparedness plans and operational changes. Crisis decision-making was made via teams or shared efforts between key persons. Anticipation of and responses to increased demand and stocking, coordination and collaboration among pharmaceutical supply chain stakeholders were identified as key challenges. The study extends crisis management process models to the pharmaceutical industry context and advances this research field by drawing on a novel approach for data collection utilising crisis management process models for survey development. Practical implications for improving future preparedness are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Latonen, S. & Pussila, S. & Seeck, Hannele & Airaksinen, M. & Juppo, A. M., 2025. "Crisis management in the pharmaceutical industry during the COVID-19 pandemic," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128184, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:128184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/128184/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:ecpoli:v:16:y:2001:i:32:p:51-82 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gisela Wachinger & Ortwin Renn & Chloe Begg & Christian Kuhlicke, 2013. "The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 1049-1065, June.
    3. Latonen, S. H. & Suominen, R. M. & Juppo, A. M. & Airaksinen, M. & Seeck, Hannele, 2023. "Organisation of cross-sector collaboration and its influence on crisis management effectiveness among pharmaceutical supply chain stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120001, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Joseph Lampel & Jamal Shamsie & Zur Shapira, 2009. "Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 835-845, October.
    5. Latonen, S. & Juppo, A. M. & Seeck, Hannele & Airaksinen, M., 2025. "Crisis management in Finnish hospital pharmacies during the COVID-19 pandemic," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127785, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. repec:oup:ecpoli:v:16:y:2001:i:32:p:51-82 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Claus Rerup, 2009. "Attentional Triangulation: Learning from Unexpected Rare Crises," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 876-893, October.
    8. Michael Bordo & Barry Eichengreen & Daniela Klingebiel & Maria Soledad Martinez-Peria, 2001. "Is the crisis problem growing more severe?," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 16(32), pages 52-82.
    9. Francesca Faggioni & Marco Valerio Rossi & Andrea Sestino, 2023. "Supply Chain Resilience in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Qualitative Analysis from Scholarly and Managerial Perspectives," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(1), pages 129-129, February.
    10. Kati Heiskanen & Riitta Ahonen & Risto Kanerva & Pekka Karttunen & Johanna Timonen, 2017. "The reasons behind medicine shortages from the perspective of pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical wholesalers in Finland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Saunes, Ingrid Sperre & Vrangbæk, Karsten & Byrkjeflot, Haldor & Jervelund, Signe Smith & Birk, Hans Okkels & Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa & Keskimäki, Ilmo & Sigurgeirsdóttir, Sigurbjörg & Janlöv, Nils & R, 2022. "Nordic responses to Covid-19: Governance and policy measures in the early phases of the pandemic," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 418-426.
    12. Karl E. Weick, 1988. "Enacted Sensemaking In Crisis Situations[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 305-317, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Duchek, 2020. "Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 215-246, April.
    2. André Luis Silva & Márcia de Freitas Duarte & Flávia Plutarco, 2020. "Organizational Rare Events: Theory and Research Practice," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 635-659, October.
    3. Jenni Dinger & Michael Conger & David Hekman & Carla Bustamante, 2020. "Somebody That I Used to Know: The Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Social Identity in Post-disaster Business Communities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 115-141, September.
    4. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    5. Feduzi, Alberto & Runde, Jochen, 2014. "Uncovering unknown unknowns: Towards a Baconian approach to management decision-making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 268-283.
    6. Joseph Lampel & Jamal Shamsie & Zur Shapira, 2009. "Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 835-845, October.
    7. Arman ESHRAGHI & Hidetomo TAKAHASHI & Peng XU, 2021. "Early-Life War Experiences and Corporate Financial Outcomes," Discussion papers 21081, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Sharma, Amalesh & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Moses, Aditya C., 2021. "Responses to COVID-19: The role of governance, healthcare infrastructure, and learning from past pandemics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 597-607.
    9. Pamela R. Haunschild & Francisco Polidoro & David Chandler, 2015. "Organizational Oscillation Between Learning and Forgetting: The Dual Role of Serious Errors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1682-1701, December.
    10. Ehrmann, & Meiseberg,, 2016. "Managementforschung und was die Praxis von ihr (nicht) will – Eine marktorientierte Betrachtung," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(2), pages 187-206.
    11. Liliana Pérez‐Nordtvedt & Kilho Shin & Joohan Lee, 2023. "Effective Firm Alignment with SIGEL Crises: The Temporal Mindsets of Decision Makers," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1549-1583, September.
    12. Jennifer M. Oetzel & Chang Hoon Oh, 2014. "Learning to Carry the Cat by the Tail: Firm Experience, Disasters, and Multinational Subsidiary Entry and Expansion," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 732-756, June.
    13. John Joseph & Vibha Gaba, 2015. "The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 1960-1978, December.
    14. Godé, Cécile & Lebraty, Jean-Fabrice, 2015. "Experience feedback as an enabler of coordination: An aerobatic military team case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 424-436.
    15. Raghu Garud & Roger L. M. Dunbar & Caroline A. Bartel, 2011. "Dealing with Unusual Experiences: A Narrative Perspective on Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 587-601, June.
    16. Sébastien Travadel & Franck Guarnieri & Aurélien Portelli, 2018. "Industrial Safety and Utopia: Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 56-70, January.
    17. Kristina Vaarst Andersen & Karin Beukel & Beverly B. Tyler, 2021. "Learning to Litigate: the Relationship Between Past Litigation Experience and Litigation Outcomes in the Chinese Intellectual Property System," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 479-500, December.
    18. Jennifer Oetzel & Chang Hoon Oh, 2021. "A storm is brewing: Antecedents of disaster preparation in risk prone locations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1545-1570, August.
    19. Joshi, Amol M. & Hemmatian, Iman, 2018. "How do legal surprises drive organizational attention and case resolution? An analysis of false patent marking lawsuits," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1741-1761.
    20. Blankenburg Holm, Desirée & Drogendijk, Rian & Haq, Hammad ul, 2020. "An attention-based view on managing information processing channels in organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:128184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.