IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/108167.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An intentional profit-generating strategy can be detrimental to a sustainable organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Chakravarti, Jayani
  • Basso, Frédéric

Abstract

Sustainable organisations have to be profitable to maintain their economic and social activity. However, prior literature finds that people are reluctant to associate profitability with sustainability, which leads to negative judgement. Through experimental evidence, the current research supports this idea but shows that profitability actually backfires within sustainable organisational contexts when it is intentional, rather than unintentional. Results indicate that consumers use a zero-sum heuristic on resource allocation when they are presented with a green product that is intentionally (vs. unintentionally) profit-generating. They infer from intended (vs. unintended) profitability that the organisation devoted greater resources to make profit rather than to make the product more sustainable. This product thus appears less sustainable to consumers and they are less interested in buying it. The article concludes with a discussion on the implications of this research for sustainable organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakravarti, Jayani & Basso, Frédéric, 2021. "An intentional profit-generating strategy can be detrimental to a sustainable organisation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108167, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:108167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/108167/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate sustainability; green product; morality; tainted altruism; zero-sum heuristic; Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:108167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.