IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/edj/ceauch/213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La Productividad Científica de Economía y Administración en Chile. Un Análisis Comparativo

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Contreras
  • Gonzalo Edwards
  • Alejandra Mizala

Abstract

Este trabajo compara el volumen y la calidad de la productividad científica de las ciencias económicas y administrativas en Chile, con el resto de las disciplinas científicas a nivel nacional y con economía y administración y otras disciplinas a nivel internacional. Dado que la productividad científica no es homogénea entre las disciplinas, las comparaciones utilizan un acute;ndice que mide la productividad por disciplina relativa al nivel internacional promedio. El trabajo también contrasta el monto de recursos públicos destinados a la investigación en las distintas disciplinas en Chile y su eficiencia relativa.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Contreras & Gonzalo Edwards & Alejandra Mizala, 2005. "La Productividad Científica de Economía y Administración en Chile. Un Análisis Comparativo," Documentos de Trabajo 213, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    • Handle: RePEc:edj:ceauch:213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cea-uchile.cl/wp-content/uploads/doctrab/ASOCFILE120051117121040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia Contreras & Gonzalo Edwards & Alejandra Mizala, 2006. "La Productividad Científica de Economía y Administración en Chile. Un Análisis Comparativo," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 43(128), pages 331-354.
    2. John B. Davis, 1998. "Problems in Using the Social Sciences Citation Index to Rank Economics Journals," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 42(2), pages 59-64, October.
    3. Claudia Contreras & Gonzalo Edwards & Alejandra Mizala, 2006. "The Current Impact Factor and the long-term impact of scientific journals by discipline: A logistic diffusion model estimation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 69(3), pages 689-696, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Contreras & Gonzalo Edwards & Alejandra Mizala, 2006. "La Productividad Científica de Economía y Administración en Chile. Un Análisis Comparativo," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 43(128), pages 331-354.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Jeannin, 2004. "Les économistes et leurs revues," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 114(3), pages 275-288.
    2. Mladen M. Koljatic & Mónica R. Silva, 2001. "The international publication productivity of Latin American countries in the economics and business administration fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(2), pages 381-394, June.
    3. Pilar Valderrama & Manuel Escabias & Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras & Mariano J. Valderrama & Pilar Baca, 2018. "A mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional model to forecast the journal impact factor in the field of Dentistry," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1203-1212, August.
    4. Yolanda Kodrzycki & Pingkang David Yu, 2005. "New approaches to ranking economics journals," Working Papers 05-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    5. Joseph Macri & Dipendra Sinha, 2006. "Rankings Methodology for International Comparisons of Institutions and Individuals: an Application to Economics in Australia and New Zealand," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 111-156, February.
    6. Samuel Bjork & Avner Offer & Gabriel Söderberg, 2014. "Time series citation data: the Nobel Prize in economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 185-196, January.
    7. Gaines Liner & Minesh Amin, 2004. "Methods of ranking economics journals," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 32(2), pages 140-149, June.
    8. John H. Huston & Roger W. Spencer, 2018. "Using Network Centrality to Inform Our View of Nobel Economists," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 616-628, September.
    9. Michael Bräuninger & Justus Haucap, 2003. "Reputation and Relevance of Economics Journals," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 175-197, May.
    10. Chagas , André Luis Squarize, 2017. "Publish or Perish: um ranking de revistas da subárea de Economia Regional e Urbana para os pesquisadores brasileiros," Revista Brasileira de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos, Associação Brasileira de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos (ABER), vol. 11(4), pages 515-536.
    11. Molero, Juan Carlos & Pujol, Francesc, 2004. "Ranking Italian Universities and Other Research Institutions Taking Into Account Public Economics Publications," MPRA Paper 8055, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Mladen Koljatic & Monica Silva, 2001. "Authorship Characteristics Of Latin-American Publications In Economics And Business Administration: An Exploratory Assessment," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(1), pages 83-94.
    13. Axel Schlinghoff & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2002. "Publikationsindikatoren und die Stabilität wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenrankings," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 343-362, June.
    14. Gaines Liner, 2001. "Core authors and rankings in economics," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 29(4), pages 459-468, December.
    15. Roger W. Spencer & John H. Huston & Rachel Branyan, 2009. "Influential Macromonetary Publications and Economists," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 54(2), pages 91-106, October.
    16. Erjen Van Nierop, 2009. "Why do statistics journals have low impact factors?," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(1), pages 52-62, February.
    17. O'Leary, Dan, 2008. "On the relationship between citations and appearances on “top 25” download lists in the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 61-75.
    18. Tamela D. Ferguson & Mark S. Dorfman & William L. Ferguson, 2005. "Risk Management and Insurance‐Related Journals: A Survey of Risk and Insurance Academics," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 8(1), pages 65-101, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edj:ceauch:213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceuclcl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.