IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Multinationals, foreign ownership and US productivity leadership: Evidence from the UK

Listed author(s):
  • Criscuolo, Chiara
  • Ralf Martin

    (Centre for Research into Business Activity)

Several studies using firm level data find that foreign-owned firms are more productive than domestic ones. This could reflect a foreign advantage or an omitted variable bias: foreign firms are by definition multinational enterprises (MNEs), and MNEs are typically more productive than non-MNEs. This paper attempts to discriminate between these hypotheses. We are the first to study the productivity of foreign owned firms relative to UK firms separated into MNEs and non-MNEs. We obtain three main results. First, the foreign productivity advantage is mostly a multinational advantage: MNEs, foreign and UK, are more productive than non-MNEs. Second, US owned firms maintain a productivity advantage with respect to both UK and other foreign owned firms. Third, examining the longitudinal dimension of our data we find no evidence that higher MNE productivity is driven by sharing superior firm specific knowledge among affiliated plants. Thus, the MNE advantage must lie in an ability to takeover already productive plants or in setting up above average productivity plants on green field.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Royal Economic Society in its series Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2003 with number 50.

in new window

Date of creation: 04 Jun 2003
Handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:50
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2 Dean Trench Street, Westminster, SW1P 3HE

Phone: +44 20 3137 6301
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.