IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Ranking de gestoras de fondos de pensiones en España. 1990-2010

  • Fernandez, Pablo

    ()

    (IESE Business School)

  • Aguirreamalloa, Javier

    (IESE Business School)

  • Corres, Luis

    (IESE Business School)

Este documento contiene un ranking de las gestoras realizado comparando la evolución de sus fondos desde 1990 hasta 2010, según los datos proporcionados por Inverco. Según este ranking, las mejores gestoras fueron: Bestinver, Mutua Madrileña y Merchbanc; las peores fueron: Caja Cataluña, Caja Mediterráneo y Fineco. No es igual invertir en una gestora que en otra. Por ejemplo, 1.000 euros invertidos hace 10 años en el mejor plan de renta variable mixta se han convertido en 3.122, mientras que invertidos en el peor, se han convertido en 602. Se analiza la relación del ranking con diversas variables, entre otras: rentabilidad promedio de los fondos gestionados por cada gestora, número de fondos, patrimonio, partícipes...

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0904.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Noelia Romero)


Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by IESE Business School in its series IESE Research Papers with number D/904.

as
in new window

Length: 11 pages
Date of creation: 05 Feb 2011
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0904
Contact details of provider: Postal: IESE Business School, Av Pearson 21, 08034 Barcelona, SPAIN
Web page: http://www.iese.edu/

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Noelia Romero)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.