IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/iesewp/d-0904.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ranking de gestoras de fondos de pensiones en España. 1990-2010

Author

Listed:
  • Fernandez, Pablo

    () (IESE Business School)

  • Aguirreamalloa, Javier

    (IESE Business School)

  • Corres, Luis

    (IESE Business School)

Abstract

Este documento contiene un ranking de las gestoras realizado comparando la evolución de sus fondos desde 1990 hasta 2010, según los datos proporcionados por Inverco. Según este ranking, las mejores gestoras fueron: Bestinver, Mutua Madrileña y Merchbanc; las peores fueron: Caja Cataluña, Caja Mediterráneo y Fineco. No es igual invertir en una gestora que en otra. Por ejemplo, 1.000 euros invertidos hace 10 años en el mejor plan de renta variable mixta se han convertido en 3.122, mientras que invertidos en el peor, se han convertido en 602. Se analiza la relación del ranking con diversas variables, entre otras: rentabilidad promedio de los fondos gestionados por cada gestora, número de fondos, patrimonio, partícipes...

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandez, Pablo & Aguirreamalloa, Javier & Corres, Luis, 2011. "Ranking de gestoras de fondos de pensiones en España. 1990-2010," IESE Research Papers D/904, IESE Business School.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0904.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fondos pensiones; gestoras; INVERCO; rentabilidad partícipes;

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Noelia Romero). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ienaves.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.