IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Ranking de gestoras de fondos de inversión en España. 1994-2009

Listed author(s):
  • Fernandez, Pablo


    (IESE Business School)

  • del Campo, Javier

    (IESE Business School)

Este documento contiene un ranking de las gestoras realizado comparando la evolución de sus fondos desde 1994 hasta 2009. Una gestora ha sido mejor que otra cuando sus fondos han obtenido menor diferencia con los mejores de su categoría (en media y corrigiendo la diferencia con la dispersión de rentabilidades de cada categoría). Según este ranking, las mejores gestoras fueron Bestinver, Metagestión y Mutua Madrileña; las peores fueron: Caja Ingenieros, Acapital Finanzas y Gestefin. Se analiza la relación del ranking con diversas variables, entre otras: rentabilidad promedio de los fondos gestionados por cada gestora, número de fondos, patrimonio, partícipes, suscripciones netas en 2009, porcentaje de fondos con rentabilidad negativa y dispersión promedio de los fondos de cada gestora, promedio del ranking según Inverco de los fondos de cada gestora? No es cierto que las gestoras pequeñas lo hagan mejor que las grandes: unas sí y otras no.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by IESE Business School in its series IESE Research Papers with number D/847.

in new window

Length: 30 pages
Date of creation: 07 Mar 2010
Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0847
Contact details of provider: Postal:
IESE Business School, Av Pearson 21, 08034 Barcelona, SPAIN

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Noelia Romero)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.