IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Does transition make you happy?

  • Peter Sanfey


    (European Bank of Reconstruction and Development)

  • Utku Teksoz

    (European Bank of Reconstruction and Development)

Low-income households spend a substantial share of their income on utility services such as electricity, heating and water. The difficulty these socially vulnerable consumers have in affording further tariff increases is often used as an argument against tariff reform. However, detailed information on the utility expenditures of different consumer groups and the affordability implications of tariff adjustments is scarce. Much of the available information is based on the analysis of average households. This paper takes a more detailed look at the affordability of electricity, district heating and water for low-income consumers in transition countries. While the available data is incomplete, the paper finds that affordability is a problem for low-income consumers in most countries, in particular in the water sector and in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). The affordability consequences of tariff reform ultimately depend on the speed of tariff adjustments relative to the growth in household income, the level of tariffs needed for cost recovery, the level of effective tariffs at the outset (tariffs adjusted for non-payment) and the demand response to the tariff increase. This paper finds that delaying tariff reform by a few years tends to make little difference to affordability constraints, and may therefore not be an effective way to mitigate the social impact of utility reform.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Office of the Chief Economist in its series Working Papers with number 91.

in new window

Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2005
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in P. Sanfey and U. Teksoz (2007), Economics of Transition, 15(4), pp. 707-731.
Handle: RePEc:ebd:wpaper:91
Contact details of provider: Postal: One Exchange Square, London EC2A 2JN
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebd:wpaper:91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Olga Lucas)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.