IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Reconsidering the Experimental Evidence for Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting

  • Besharov, Gregory
  • Coffey, Bentley

Experimental choices between delayed rewards are claimed to provide support for a model of preferences referred to variously as "quasi-hyperbolic," "hyperbolic," and "‚-‰." This paper shows that the experimental results do not differentiate quasi-hyperbolic discounting from exponential discounting. When experimental rewards are financial, quasi-hyperbolic agents can, like exponential agents, become better off by choosing to maximize wealth. Because of liquidity constraints, they may choose a reward with lower net present value, but so may exponential agents for the same reason. When rewards are not financial, then the choices of even exponential agents generally cannot be restricted because of complementarities and informational issues. Since generalizing preferences from exponential to quasi-hyperbolic is neither necessary nor sufficient to generate the experimental results, there is a fundamental identification problem.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.econ.duke.edu/Papers/Abstracts03/abstract.03.03.html
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Duke University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 03-03.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:03-03
Contact details of provider: Postal: Department of Economics Duke University 213 Social Sciences Building Box 90097 Durham, NC 27708-0097
Phone: (919) 660-1800
Fax: (919) 684-8974
Web page: http://econ.duke.edu/

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:03-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Department of Economics Webmaster)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.