IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dem/wpaper/wp-2008-011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sex-specific growth and effects of hatching condition in the reversed sexually size-dimorphic great skua

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen Kalmbach

    (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany)

  • Richard Griffiths
  • Robert W. Furness

Abstract

Increased environmental sensitivity of the larger sex has been reported in several size-dimorphic vertebrate species. It is generally assumed that this is due to a higher energy demand of the larger sex, thus increasing susceptibility to food shortage. However, sex-specific growth rates might act to reduce discrepancies in energy demands of differently sized chicks. To test these ideas, we compared growth of male and female chicks in a reversed size-dimorphic seabird, the great skua Stercorarius skua, for which a higher mortality rate of female chicks has been shown. We used chick growth data of mass, tarsus and wing from unmanipulated nests, as well as from an egg removal experiment in which chicks hatched from smaller eggs and in poor body condition. Experimental chicks were raised by either of two groups of parents with differing condition. We fitted logistic growth curves to the data using non-linear mixed models. In the experimental treatments growth was only impaired in the group which was raised by poor condition parents, which underlines the importance of parental quality for chick development. At the end of the nesting period, great skua chicks exhibited a comparable degree of size dimorphism as is found in adults, although neither sex had reached final adult size. Despite females reaching larger asymptotic values, timing of growth was not different between the sexes. However, we found a sex-specific effect of hatching condition: improved hatching condition correlated with faster growth of mass and tarsus in females, but did not affect male growth. The instantaneous growth rates suggest that females face higher energetic demands during growth, especially in the latter part of chick development when size-dimorphism is most apparent. However, vulnerability appears to be connected to circumstances during early development, a time at which the dimorphism is not yet apparent in terms of size or weight. We propose that nutritional constraints during early life negatively affect the development of structures or processes that are necessary to sustain high growth rates later. We found no evidence that growth rates are adapted in order to reduce differences in sex-specific offspring cost in this size dimorphic species.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen Kalmbach & Richard Griffiths & Robert W. Furness, 2008. "Sex-specific growth and effects of hatching condition in the reversed sexually size-dimorphic great skua," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2008-011, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2008-011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/working/wp-2008-011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Velando, 2002. "Experimental manipulation of maternal effort produces differential effects in sons and daughters: implications for adaptive sex ratios in the blue-footed booby," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(4), pages 443-449, July.
    2. Guillermo Blanco & Jesu´s Marti´nez-Padilla & Jose´ A. Da´vila & David Serrano & Javier Vin˜uela, 2003. "First evidence of sex differences in the duration of avian embryonic period: consequences for sibling competition in sexually dimorphic birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(5), pages 702-706, September.
    3. Ellen Kalmbach & Robert W. Furness & Richard Griffiths, 2005. "Sex-biased environmental sensitivity: natural and experimental evidence from a bird species with larger females," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(2), pages 442-449, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2008-011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Wilhelm). General contact details of provider: http://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.