IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i5p702-706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First evidence of sex differences in the duration of avian embryonic period: consequences for sibling competition in sexually dimorphic birds

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Blanco
  • Jesu´s Marti´nez-Padilla
  • Jose´ A. Da´vila
  • David Serrano
  • Javier Vin˜uela

Abstract

Parental favoritism in birds would be enhanced if parents can control any egg feature influencing the ontogeny of the embryo during incubation. Egg size and composition may influence the duration of incubation and hatching periods, and eggs bearing embryos of different sex may differ in size and composition. Therefore, the sex of the embryo could also influence its ontogeny before hatching. We tested this prediction by investigating the duration of the embryonic period of different-sex embryos in the Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), a sexually dimorphic raptor in which adult females are approximately 20% heavier than are adult males. We found the first evidence of sex differences in the duration of the embryonic period in avian eggs. Female embryos had a shorter embryonic period than did male embryos, which allowed females to hatch earlier in the hatching sequence and assume a higher rank than that of males in the intrabrood size hierarchy. Embryos with a fast growth and development resulted in hatchlings with greater residual reserves and thus larger mass, which suggests that a shorter embryonic period requires less maintenance metabolism relative to growth. Our results also indicated that early hatching may be advantageous to gain a high rank in the size hierarchy within the brood independently of the effect of sex on fledgling mass. Sex differences in avian egg ontogeny may therefore be a factor shaping life-history traits associated with parental control of sibling competition, which should be addressed in any future work on optimal reproductive investment. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Blanco & Jesu´s Marti´nez-Padilla & Jose´ A. Da´vila & David Serrano & Javier Vin˜uela, 2003. "First evidence of sex differences in the duration of avian embryonic period: consequences for sibling competition in sexually dimorphic birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(5), pages 702-706, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:702-706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellen Kalmbach & Richard Griffiths & Robert W. Furness, 2008. "Sex-specific growth and effects of hatching condition in the reversed sexually size-dimorphic great skua," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2008-011, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:702-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.