IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dbl/dblwop/2300.html

Does Increasing Public Spending in Health Improve Health? Lessons from a Constitutional Reform in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Clarke, Damian
  • Rocha, Rudi
  • Szklo, Michel

Abstract

There is surprisingly scarce evidence regarding the extent to which and how government health expenditure affects health outcomes. Exploiting variation generated by Brazil’s 29th Constitutional Amendment, which mandated minimum thresholds for municipal spending on health, we examine the chain connecting government health spending to health inputs, production and outcomes, with a focus on infant mortality. We find relatively low average elasticities, but relevant heterogeneity in spending returns. Reductions in infant mortality are greater where baseline spending was lower, pointing to concave returns; where investments in infrastructure and personnel were complementary; and particularly where strong institutional and public management capabilities exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarke, Damian & Rocha, Rudi & Szklo, Michel, 2024. "Does Increasing Public Spending in Health Improve Health? Lessons from a Constitutional Reform in Brazil," Research Department working papers 2300, CAF Development Bank Of Latinamerica.
    • Handle: RePEc:dbl:dblwop:2300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2300
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arbex, Marcelo & Barros, Luiz A. & Corrêa, Márcio V., 2024. "Pandemic, inequality and public health: A quantitative analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • O5 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbl:dblwop:2300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pablo Rolando (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cafffve.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.