IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/149745.html

Sustainability-oriented Employer Branding: Identifying Real Estate-Related Requirements of Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Günther, Maria
  • Höcker, Martin Christian
  • Pfnür, Andreas

Abstract

In the current dynamic business environment, companies are faced with a wide range of economic and social changes. Through the ongoing war for talent, employer branding is becoming increasingly relevant for companies to attract and retain employees. Simultaneously, the change in social values leads to sustainability becoming a decisive criterion for many employees when choosing their employer. In response to these changes, many companies are focusing on a sustainability-oriented employer brand. Corporate real estate (CRE) can contribute to the employer branding success by meeting the employee’s sustainability requirements and communicating the sustainability-oriented employer brand. However, the increasing pluralisation of social values means that the sustainability orientations and employee requirements can differ greatly from one another. Therefore, companies and their corporate real estate management (CREM) must know their employer brand target group and which sustainability requirements they place on CRE. The aim of the present study is to analyse these real estate-related sustainability requirements of employees. By examining the relevance of the respective sustainability dimensions (ecological, economic, social) from the employees' perspective, a "fit" between employee requirements and CRE can be established in order to contribute to successful employer branding. This study analyses survey data from N = 937 German office workers. Hierarchical cluster analysis is applied to identify employee groups and their assessment of the relevance of the sustainability dimensions in the real estate context. The cluster analysis reveals a general importance of all three sustainability dimensions for the identified employee groups. However, user satisfaction and, thus, social sustainability are rated highest for all identified groups. The results suggest that the perception of sustainability-related impacts of office properties has a decisive influence on the employees' assessment. Thus, CREM can positively influence the perception of the company's real estate as well as the company itself through sustainable action.

Suggested Citation

  • Günther, Maria & Höcker, Martin Christian & Pfnür, Andreas, 2024. "Sustainability-oriented Employer Branding: Identifying Real Estate-Related Requirements of Employees," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 149745, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
  • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:149745
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/149745/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antimo Moretti & Fabrizio Menna & Milena Aulicino & Marco Paoletta & Sara Liguori & Giovanni Iolascon, 2020. "Characterization of Home Working Population during COVID-19 Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Ferdinando Toscano & Salvatore Zappalà, 2020. "Social Isolation and Stress as Predictors of Productivity Perception and Remote Work Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Concern about the Virus in a Moderated Double Mediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fiona Niebuhr & Prem Borle & Franziska Börner-Zobel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2022. "Healthy and Happy Working from Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Voll, Kyra & Höcker, Martin Christian & Bachtal, Yassien Nico & Pfnür, Andreas & Schlereth, Christian, 2024. "Identification of employee workplace choice determinants– A Best-Worst scaling study," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 149746, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Höcker, Martin Christian & Voll, Kyra & Bachtal, Yassien Nico & Pfnür, Andreas, 2024. "Return to Office: The importance of the physical workplace and organisational culture," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 149747, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Simone Donati & Gianluca Viola & Ferdinando Toscano & Salvatore Zappalà, 2021. "Not All Remote Workers Are Similar: Technology Acceptance, Remote Work Beliefs, and Wellbeing of Remote Workers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Te Li & Wen Yang, 2026. "How does remote work shape work–family balance? The interaction of work stress and leadership support," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Patryk Makowski, 2023. "Remote Leadership and Work Engagement: A Critical Review and Future Directions," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, July.
    7. Maria-Alexandra Sarbu & Cosmin-Nicolae Mirea & Mihaela Mihai & Puiu Nistoreanu & Elham Dadfar, 2021. "Teachers’ and Professors’ Perception of Telework in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 736-736, August.
    8. Loredana Mihalca & Tudor Irimias & Gabriela Brendea, 2021. "Teleworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Determining Factors of Perceived Work Productivity, Job Performance, and Satisfaction," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 620-620, August.
    9. Khedhaouria, Anis & Montani, Francesco & Jamal, Arshad & Hussain Shah, Mahmood, 2024. "Consequences of technostress for users in remote (home) work contexts during a time of crisis: The buffering role of emotional social support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Michał Błaszczyk & Milan Popović & Karolina Zajdel & Radosław Zajdel, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Organisation of Remote Work in IT Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Gloria Guidetti & Daniela Converso & Domenico Sanseverino & Chiara Ghislieri, 2022. "Return to Work during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Study on the Role of Job Demands, Job Resources, and Personal Resources upon the Administrative Staff of Italian Public Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Patrick Gad Iradukunda & Arnaud Iradukunda & Pierre Gashema & Emile Ngabo & Jean de Dieu Tuyishime & Tumusime Musafiri & Thérèse Umuhoza & Ulysse Uwayo & Enos Moyo & Richard Habimana & Claude Mambo Mu, 2025. "From COVID-19 Pandemic Pivot to Progress: Blended Work as a Pathway to Greener African Cities," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, February.
    13. Anna Nyberg & Kristiina Rajaleid & Ingrid Demmelmaier, 2022. "The Work Environment during Coronavirus Epidemics and Pandemics: A Systematic Review of Studies Using Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Designs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-48, June.
    14. Stefania Angela Di Fusco & Antonella Spinelli & Lorenzo Castello & Edoardo Mocini & Michele Massimo Gulizia & Fabrizio Oliva & Domenico Gabrielli & Giuseppe Imperoli & Furio Colivicchi, 2021. "Impact of Working from Home on Cardiovascular Health: An Emerging Issue with the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Takahiro Ueno, 2022. "Capturing Changes in Residential Occupant Behavior Due to Work from Home in Japan as a Consequence of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Pelly, Diane & Daly, Michael & Delaney, Liam & Doyle, Orla, 2022. "Worker stress, burnout, and wellbeing before and during the COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115098, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Malou Grubben & Sara Wiertsema & Remco Hoekman & Gerbert Kraaykamp, 2022. "Is Working from Home during COVID-19 Associated with Increased Sports Participation? Contexts of Sports, Sports Location and Socioeconomic Inequality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    18. Esposito, Piero & Mendolia, Silvia & Scicchitano, Sergio & Tealdi, Cristina, 2024. "Working from Home and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Gender and Personality Traits," IZA Discussion Papers 16751, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Nada Marić & Aleksandar Popović & Sonja Peričević Medić & Milorad Španović & Nataša Maksimović, 2023. "Prevalence and Factors Associated with Mental Health Problems among Essential and Nonessential Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic, June 2021, in an Unstable and Developing Country: A Cross-Sectional Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Md Belal Ahmad & Ajhar Hussain & Firoz Ahmad, 2022. "The use of social media at work place and its influence on the productivity of the employees in the era of COVID-19," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(10), pages 1-29, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:149745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.