IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cty/dpaper/06-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The hypostatisation of the concept of equilibrium in neoclassical economics

Author

Listed:
  • Denis, A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis, A., 2006. "The hypostatisation of the concept of equilibrium in neoclassical economics," Working Papers 06/02, Department of Economics, City University London.
    • Handle: RePEc:cty:dpaper:06/02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/1445/1/0602_denis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicola Giocoli, 2003. "Modeling Rational Agents," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2585, March.
    2. Andy Denis, 2004. "Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 341-357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andy Denis, 2008. "Dialectics and the Austrian School: A Surprising Commonality in the Methodology of Heterodox Economics?," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 151-173, March.
    2. Kotosz Balázs, 2014. "Heterodoxies in the Work of János Kornai: How Far from the Mainstream?," Journal of Heterodox Economics, Sciendo, vol. 1(2), pages 131-144, December.
    3. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2010. "Axiomatic Basics of e-Economics," MPRA Paper 24331, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur Brackmann Netto, 2017. "The Double Edge of Case-Studies: A Frame-Based Definition of Economic Models," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_21, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    2. Marek Hudik, 0. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    3. Zappia, Carlo, 2021. "Leonard Savage, The Ellsberg Paradox, And The Debate On Subjective Probabilities: Evidence From The Archives," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 169-192, June.
    4. Cléo Chassonnery-Zaïgouche & Lauren Larrouy, 2017. "“From warfare to welfare”: Contextualising Arrow and Schelling's models of racial inequalities (1968–1972)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1355-1387, November.
    5. Giocoli, Nicola, 2011. "From Wald to Savage: homo economicus becomes a Bayesian statistician," MPRA Paper 34117, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Andy Denis, 2013. "Pluralism in economics education," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 5, pages 88-105, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Erich Pinzón Fuchs, 2014. "Econometrics as a Pluralistic Scientific Tool for Economic Planning: On Lawrence R. Klein's Econometrics," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14080, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    8. Francesco GRECO, 2017. "Complexity and economy," International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Spiru Haret University, vol. 4(1), pages 181-189, November.
    9. Marek Hudik, 2020. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 349-368, October.
    10. Bee, Michele & Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime, 2023. "The Birth Of Homo Œconomicus: The Methodological Debate On The Economic Agent From J. S. Mill To V. Pareto," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Hichem Ben-El-Mechaiekh & Robert W. Dimand, 2010. "Von Neumann, Ville, And The Minimax Theorem," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(02), pages 115-137.
    12. Samerski, Silja, 2019. "Health literacy as a social practice: Social and empirical dimensions of knowledge on health and healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Passarella, Marco, 2007. "Per una storia analitica dell'economia politica. Alcune considerazioni sulle prospettive della Storia del Pensiero Economico [Notes for an analytical history of the political economy]," MPRA Paper 28674, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Feb 2011.
    14. D. Wade Hands, 2010. "Stabilizing consumer choice: the role of 'true dynamic stability' and related concepts in the history of consumer choice theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 313-343.
    15. Denis, A., 2010. "A century of methodological individualism part 1: Schumpeter and Menger," Working Papers 10/02, Department of Economics, City University London.
    16. Imko Meyenburg, 2022. "A possibilist justification of the ontology of counterfactuals and forecasted states of economies in economic modelling," Working Papers hal-03751205, HAL.
    17. D. Wade Hands, 2012. "The Rise and Fall of Walrasian Microeconomics: The Keynesian Effect," Chapters, in: Microfoundations Reconsidered, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Giocoli, Nicola, 2008. "Three alternative (?) stories on the late 20th-century rise of game theory," MPRA Paper 33808, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Caroline Gerschlager, 2012. "Agents of change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 413-441, July.
    20. Marco Dardi, 2006. "Choice, preference and rationalizability in pareto’s theory of economic behavior," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 53(4), pages 476-490, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cty:dpaper:06/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research Publications Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decituk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.