IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

401(k) Plans and Women: A "Good News/Bad News" Story

Listed author(s):
  • Alicia H. Munnell


    (Center for Retirement Research at Boston College)

  • Steven A. Sass


    (Center for Retirement Research at Boston College)

Over the past two decades, coverage under employer-sponsored pension plans has shifted from traditional defined benefit to 401(k)-type defined contribution formats. This shift has many important implications for retirement security. This brief examines the differential impact of the transition for men and women. For women, the shift from defined benefit to 401(k) plans is a “good news/ bad news” story. When women are employed and accruing retirement income benefits, the news is good. 401(k) plans are better for short-tenured workers, and women are more likely than men to have short tenures. Therefore, more women are likely to end up with more benefits and their benefits are likely to be larger when they have a 401(k) plan rather than a traditional defined benefit plan. The bad news arrives when women retire. As women tend to live longer than men, their 401(k) balances must provide an income stream over a longer stretch of time. Should they wish to annuitize a portion of their 401(k) accumulations at retirement, they will find that insurance companies compensate by providing smaller benefits to women, and larger benefits to men. In defined benefit plans, men and women with comparable work histories would get the same monthly benefit. Women who rely on their husband’s earnings and pension benefits are also affected by the shift from defined benefit plans to 401(k)s. Under traditional defined benefit plans, the government requires that the worker receive a joint-and-survivor annuity at retirement, unless the spouse specifically waives the requirement. This provision gives the wife a legal claim on her husband’s pension benefit. No such automatic claim exists with 401(k) plans. At this point, it is unclear whether the good news or bad news will carry the day. But the outcome is extremely important because women have not done well in our retirement income system. Among elderly women without a husband, more than one in four is poor or near poor. Among single women age 85 and over, the figure approaches one in three. To date, elderly women have relied heavily on Social Security, but in the future Social Security will replace a far smaller share of pre-retirement earnings than it does at present. Fortunately, women’s labor force participation, earnings, and participation in employer plans have all increased significantly over the past three decades. Their retirement income security thus will depend increasingly on 401(k) plans, so it matters a lot whether the good news in the accumulation of benefits sufficiently outweighs the bad news in the payout of benefits.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Center for Retirement Research in its series Just the Facts with number jtf_13.

in new window

Length: 5 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2005
Handle: RePEc:crr:jusfac:jtf_13
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Hovey House, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467

Phone: (617) 552-1762
Fax: (617) 552-0191
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:jusfac:jtf_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Grzybowski)

or (Christopher F Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.