IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2015-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investment Returns: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia H. Munnell
  • Jean-Pierre Aubry
  • Caroline V. Crawford

Abstract

Pension coverage in the private sector has shifted from defined benefit plans, where professionals make investment decisions, to 401(k) plans, where partici­pants are responsible for their own investment strat­egy. The supposition is that individuals are not very good at investing their own money and face high fees. The question is whether this supposition is borne out by the facts. That is, are returns on defined contribu­tion plans markedly lower than those on traditional defined benefit plans? This brief first discusses alternative ways to mea­sure the rate of return. The second section reports, under a variety of definitions, returns on defined benefit and defined contribution plans for 1990-2012 from the Department of Labor’s Form 5500. The third section explores the asset allocation of defined benefit and defined contribution plans and its poten­tial impact on returns. The fourth section presents regression results of the relationship between returns and plan type (defined benefit or defined contribu­tion), controlling for plan size and asset allocation. The fifth section discusses the extent to which fees may explain the lower return in defined contribution plans. The final section reports on Individual Retire­ment Accounts (IRAs) – the assets in these accounts now exceed holdings in either defined benefit or de­fined contribution plans, largely due to rollovers from employer-sponsored plans. The bottom line is that, during 1990-2012, defined benefit plans outperformed defined contribution plans by 0.7 percent. Since this differential remains even after controlling for size and asset allocation, the likely explanation is higher fees in defined contribu­tion accounts. The available data suggest that IRAs produce even lower returns than defined contribution plans, which implies trouble ahead given the massive amount of money that is being rolled over into IRAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia H. Munnell & Jean-Pierre Aubry & Caroline V. Crawford, 2015. "Investment Returns: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution Plans," Issues in Brief ib2015-21, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2015-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/investment-returns-defined-benefit-vs-defined-contribution-plans/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guan, Yanling & Tang, Dragon Yongjun, 2018. "Employees' risk attitude and corporate risk taking: Evidence from pension asset allocations," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 261-274.
    2. Dorian Carloni, 2018. "How Nominal Foreign Currency Depreciation Against the U.S. Dollar Affects U.S. Wealth: Working Paper 2018-05," Working Papers 53931, Congressional Budget Office.
    3. Mahmoudi, Samir Elsadek, 2023. "Late-career unemployment shocks, pension outcomes and unemployment insurance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Kamil Nowak, 2017. "Low Cost Retirement Solutions Based On Robo-Advisors And Exchange Traded Funds," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 6(3), pages 75-94.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2015-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.