IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crm/wpaper/26009.html

Who Benefits from Remote Schooling? Self-Selection and Match Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Campos
  • Jesse Bruhn
  • Eric Chyn
  • Anh Tran

Abstract

We study the distributional effects of remote learning using a novel approach combining preference data from a conjoint survey with administrative records. Experimentally derived preferences account for selection into remote learning and treatment effect heterogeneity. We validate the approach using random variation from school choice lotteries. On average, remote learning reduced reading and math achievement, but children whose parents showed strongest demand experienced positive effects. Parental concerns about bullying strongly predict demand, and remote learning consistently reduced bullying, partly offsetting learning losses. These results suggest that students who sort into post-pandemic remote learning may benefit from its expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Campos & Jesse Bruhn & Eric Chyn & Anh Tran, 2026. "Who Benefits from Remote Schooling? Self-Selection and Match Effects," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26009, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
  • Handle: RePEc:crm:wpaper:26009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rfberlin.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/26009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crm:wpaper:26009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Moritz Lubczyk or Matthew Nibloe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cmucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.