IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/7178.html

Competitive IPOs

Author

Listed:
  • Jenkinson, Tim
  • Jones, Howard

Abstract

Competition between investment banks for lead underwriter mandates in IPOs is fierce, but having committed to a particular bank, the power of the issuer is greatly reduced. Although information revelation theories justify giving the underwriters influence over pricing and allocation, this creates the potential for conflicts of interest. In this clinical paper we analyse an interesting innovation that has been used in recent European IPOs whereby issuers separate the preparation and distribution roles of investment banks, and keep competitive pressure on the banks throughout the issue process. These ?competitive IPOs? allow the issuer greater control and facilitate more contingent fee structures that help to mitigate against ?bait and switch.? But unlike more radical departures from traditional bookbuilding ? such as auctions ? the competitive IPO is an incremental market-based response to potential conflicts of interest that retains many of the advantages of investment banks? active involvement in issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenkinson, Tim & Jones, Howard, 2009. "Competitive IPOs," CEPR Discussion Papers 7178, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP7178
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hidenori Takahashi, 2018. "Affiliation ties and underwriter selection," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 325-338, February.
    2. Wolfgang Bessler & Matthias Stanzel, 2009. "Conflicts of Interest and Research Quality of Affiliated Analysts in the German Universal Banking System: Evidence from IPO Underwriting," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 757-786, September.
    3. Juyoun Ryoo & Cheolwoo Lee & Jin Q Jeon, 2020. "Sustainability of Analyst Recommendations in Multiple Lead Underwriter IPOs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-36, March.
    4. Silva, Wesley Mendes da & Costa Júnior, Newton C. A. da & Barros, Lucas Ayres & Armada, Manuel Rocha & Norvilitis, Jill M., 2015. "Behavioral finance: advances in the last decade," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 55(1), January.
    5. Almeida, Vinicio de Souza e & Leal, Ricardi Pereira Câmara, 2015. "Análise experimental conjunta do comportamento do investidor em IPOs," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 55(1), January.
    6. Jeon, Jin Q. & Lee, Cheolwoo & Nasser, Tareque & Via, M. Tony, 2015. "Multiple lead underwriter IPOs and firm visibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 128-149.
    7. Martijn J. Assem & Nico L. Sar & Philippe Versijp, 2017. "CEOs and CFOs on IPOs: The Process and Success of Going Public," De Economist, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 381-410, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.