IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/16772.html

Can Sticky Portfolios Explain International Capital Flows and Asset Prices?

Author

Listed:
  • Bacchetta, Philippe
  • Davenport, Margaret
  • van Wincoop, Eric

Abstract

Recently portfolio choice has become an important element of many DSGE open economy models. Yet, a substantial body of evidence is inconsistent with standard frictionless portfolio choice models. In this paper we introduce a quadratic cost of changes in portfolio allocation into a two-country DSGE model. We investigate the level of portfolio frictions most consistent with the data and the impact of portfolio frictions on asset prices and net capital flows. We find the portfolio friction accounts for (i) micro evidence of portfolio inertia by households, (ii) macro evidence of the price impact of financial shocks and related disconnect of asset prices from fundamentals, (iii) a broad set of moments related to the time series behavior of saving, investment and net capital flows, and (iv) other phenomena relating to excess return dynamics. Financial and saving shocks each account for close to half of the variance of net capital flows.

Suggested Citation

  • Bacchetta, Philippe & Davenport, Margaret & van Wincoop, Eric, 2021. "Can Sticky Portfolios Explain International Capital Flows and Asset Prices?," CEPR Discussion Papers 16772, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP16772
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gautam Milind Gokhale & Ankur Mittal, 2024. "Exploring the Nexus of Capital Market and Investor Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 65-76, March.
    3. Nelson Camanho & Harald Hau & Hélène Rey, 2022. "Global Portfolio Rebalancing and Exchange Rates," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(11), pages 5228-5274.
    4. Zhengyang Jiang & Robert J. Richmond & Tony Zhang, 2024. "A Portfolio Approach to Global Imbalances," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(3), pages 2025-2076, June.
    5. Zehri, Chokri, 2022. "Asymmetric impact of capital controls on international trade," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    6. Simon Tièche & Didier Cossin, 2025. "Optimal Portfolio Choice in a General Equilibrium Model with Portfolio Frictions and Short-Selling Constraint," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Guillermo Hausmann-Guil, 2025. "Solving DSGE models with incomplete markets by perturbation," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 57, July.
    8. Goldberg, Linda S. & Krogstrup, Signe, 2023. "International capital flow pressures and global factors," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Rong Li & Dongzhou Mei & Bing Tong, 2024. "Gradual Portfolio Adjustment, Foreign Exchange Intervention, and Open Market Operations," CFDS Discussion Paper Series 2024/6, Center for Financial Development and Stability at Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
    10. Chokri Zehri, 2023. "The Volatility Lowering Effects of Capital Controls," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 15(3), pages 385-408, September.
    11. Eyquem, Aurélien & Poilly, Céline & Belianska, Anna, 2023. "On portfolio frictions, asset returns and volatility," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.