IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2015s-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La politique commerciale du Canada envers l’Asie : fin de l’ambivalence ?

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Leblond

Abstract

Le dynamisme économique de l’Asie est indéniable. L’Asie représente maintenant le deuxième partenaire commercial du Canada, devant l’Europe. Cependant, le gouvernement fédéral canadien est réticent à s’engager pleinement afin de faciliter les échanges économiques entre l’Asie et le Canada. Sa politique commerciale envers l’Asie a été jusqu’à maintenant de nature plutôt réactive que proactive. Bien qu’il y ait des signes de changement, le Canada se doit d’être plus actif sur le plan commercial afin de faciliter et d’encourager les échanges de ses entreprises avec l’Asie. En conséquence, le gouvernement du Canada se doit d’abandonner son ambivalence envers l’Asie et envoyer un signal clair aux partenaires économiques de la région qu’il veut faire du Canada un pays à part entière de l’Asie-Pacifique.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Leblond, 2015. "La politique commerciale du Canada envers l’Asie : fin de l’ambivalence ?," CIRANO Working Papers 2015s-24, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2015s-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2015s-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Hoekman, 2014. "The Bali Trade Facilitation Agreement and Rulemaking in the WTO: Milestone, Mistake or Mirage?," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/102, European University Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Staiger, Robert & Bagwell, Kyle & Bown, Chad, 2015. "Is the WTO Passé?," CEPR Discussion Papers 10672, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Decreux, Yvan & Fontagné, Lionel, 2015. "What Next for Multilateral Trade Talks? Quantifying the Role of Negotiation Modalities," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 29-43, January.
    3. Bernard Hoekman & Ben Shepherd, 2017. "Services Productivity, Trade Policy and Manufacturing Exports," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 499-516, March.
    4. Bernard Hoekman, 2015. "Trade Agreements and International Regulatory Cooperation in a Supply Chain World," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/04, European University Institute.
    5. Kyle Bagwell & Chad P. Bown & Robert W. Staiger, 2016. "Is the WTO Passé?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1125-1231, December.
    6. Kaewkamol Pitakdumrongkit, 2017. "Beyond The Secretariat: Addressing Governance Issues In Asean Economic Community," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(03), pages 741-759, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2015s-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.