IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/23-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deciding for Others: Local Public Good Contributions with Intermediaries

Author

Listed:
  • Andrej Angelovski

    (Middlesex University)

  • Praveen Kujal

    (Middlesex University and Chapman University)

  • Christos Mavridis

    (Gabriele d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescar)

Abstract

Given the prevalence of local public goods, whose broader use is often limited by distance and borders, we propose a potential solution to the free-riding problem by having each participant/beneficiary delegate the public good contribution decision to a non-local intermediary who neither puts in own endowment into the public good nor benefits from it. Intermediaries make decisions under two compensation mechanisms where the incentives for the intermediary are either non-aligned (fixed) or aligned (variable) with those of the beneficiary. We find that the use of intermediaries, regardless of whether their compensation is aligned or not with that of the beneficiary, significantly increases contributions to the provision of the public good. We conclude that individuals behave differently when they (formally) make decisions for someone else even if their incentive structures are identical.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrej Angelovski & Praveen Kujal & Christos Mavridis, 2023. "Deciding for Others: Local Public Good Contributions with Intermediaries," Working Papers 23-06, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:23-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public goods; intermediaries; delegation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:23-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.